SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D. Long who wrote (222290)10/3/2007 4:25:41 PM
From: Oral Roberts  Respond to of 794335
 
I'll dub it the "secede and bleed" precedent.

That's some funny stuff:)



To: D. Long who wrote (222290)10/3/2007 4:30:18 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794335
 
I believe under the Constitution it's called an "insurrection".

Well, you believe wrong.

The Insurrection Act, 10 U.S.C. 331 - 10 U.S.C. 335, and the Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U. S. C. 1835, substantially limit the Prez's power to use federal troops for law enforcement purposes.

Now, y'all could declare war on us, but that would be an implicit recognition of our status. Plus, we would be recognized by our fine Latin American friends and a host of others with axes to grind. We'd have the Attorney General arguing the case at The Hague in no time, and we would win because we do have magnificent legal talent around here in addition to our natural resources you guys are pilfering.



To: D. Long who wrote (222290)10/3/2007 5:38:27 PM
From: Peter van Steennis  Respond to of 794335
 
D. Better check and see where most of the Army and other services bases are before you try to send in the Army. Many are in what was known Dixie.

Take care and good luck

Peter