Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Webster Groves who wrote (244028)	10/5/2007 3:50:41 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 281500

It's an identical IED; in fact some details on magnification indicate it's exactly the same one. Also notice clothes of bearer and black watch on left hand. The British analysis was that the devices, although effective on light armour, were haphazardly made - not something off an assembly line. Both showed a picture of a shaped charge and the guy had a black watch on, gee the kind that the military uses, what an amazing coincidence, point taken, though of what I don't know. So basically you say that the entire US army are liars and the entire British army too, and now somehow they got the NATO commanders in Afghanistan in on this vast conspiracy. Because all these guys say that these charges were made in Iran and they come with Iranian smugglers and trainers attached to the Qods forces, some of whom are now in Coalition hands, along with their records. But what the hey, you've got some website that says these charges look haphazardly made, so I guess that proves all these people are liars! Because the Iranians wouldn't make anything haphazardly, now would they? Or is it only offensive if Iranians ship in really good explosives to kill Americans and Brits with, haphazardly made ones get a free pass? Whatever, dude. I suppose 9/11 was an inside job too?