Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: queenleah who wrote (1414)	10/6/2007 9:46:03 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2121

Ms. Queen...Yes someone has heard something "more directly from James" (who was in my opinion, was falsely accused by the Bob Brinker's). Isn't there some kind of an old saying about not eavesdropping, if you aren't prepared to learn something negative about yourself? If not, there should be one so we could remind the Bob Brinker's about it. .

To: queenleah who wrote (1414)	10/7/2007 1:07:42 AM
From: InvesTing	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2121

Queen said, not unpredictably because of a rather obvious connection: << What may seem "obvious" to you may not be the case at all, Kirk. But without getting too long-winded or verbose on my part, I would just ask again...would you show me where I said the cancellation didn't happen>> You have only to look at his post to see that you cast doubt on the veracity of this obviously true account of the PETTY Bob Brinker move. And then you show your true goal of shilling: Keep in mind as documented you whined and peed and moaned that maybe Bob Brinker really didn't do this dastardly deed. It's obvious he did. and just like I gave you the analogy of the crooked lawyer for the guilty client you move the goal posts. <<And I agree with you about Brinker (or any newsletter writer) having the right to refuse service to anyone he wishes to...so what's all the hoo-hah (excuse me, outrage) about?>> In spite of your attempt at denial--your guru was convicted. And so instead of continuing your losing argument you admit guilt and say "so what"---Looks like it's GAME SET AND MATCH to the truth and light Queenie. Your shilling for the darth vader of newsletters who is once again shown to be a two bit petty pimp of his own newsletter is clear to everyone. Thanks for confirming what some of us KNEW!!! How's things in Colorado?