SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (23663)10/8/2007 12:01:49 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217739
 
Not at all through clenched teeth C2. The large proportion of women in Federal jobs was news to me and is not of much consequence and La Griffe made but a trivial passing comment about it, not reaching a conclusion. Nor did I. But it is noteable and should not be treated lightly - it explains why kleptocratic megalomania continues apace. Even if I'm wrong, I don't admit it through clenched teeth. I'm quite happy to be wrong though I try to avoid being wrong because it's very expensive.

Don't be side-tracked to a side issue from the point and I'm interested in your ideas on what it means.

<Women are fully grown before males by about 3 years.

I have made conclusions on what that means based on various things I know to be true [such as the difficulty in learning languages after puberty and especially after wisdom teeth are grown].

How about you say what you think it might mean?
>

Just what do you think it means? You have given no comment other than to say my ideas are bung [without saying why they are, other than they are unfashionable and people aren't supposed to say them].

Why do you think nature has arranged that human females reach puberty and adulthood so much younger than males? What do you think it means for intellectual development?

Mq the Amazing has given a detailed educational review and what needs to be done and as usual, there's a double your money back guarantee.

Noblesse oblige,
Mqurice



To: carranza2 who wrote (23663)10/9/2007 5:02:14 AM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217739
 
>>I can suggest to you other reasons why there are lots of females in government.<<

Another reason is that government jobs provide good family health insurance at reasonable rates. If the wife has such a stable job, it frees up the husband to pursue more lucrative work in riskier fields like consulting, construction, commercial fishing, etc.