Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: spiral3 who wrote (24148)	10/15/2007 9:53:10 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218833

Who gives a shit about Tibet? The Dalai Lama? If Tibet would sink inside the earth tomorrow morning, would anybody notice? That's the question one should be thinking about. It is of no consequence.

To: spiral3 who wrote (24148)	10/16/2007 1:10:20 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218833

no need to haggle over your <<assertion>> and my <<source>>, for the state of is is for all to see, that tibet IS an integral part of china recognized by all members of UN, and the young dalai lama has already been chosen by parties that did the choosing, and cb ilaine can not revive the old tibet with good conscience, unless she is not a human. current dalai lama represents in the main the exiled previledged of old tibet and their ilk, iow, criminals against humanity and their offsprings born in india so, until such time that the world can in good conscience hand uganda to idi's kids who are not responsible for idi's crimes, nothing more to be said for tibet, even if idi's kids should evolve into a book writing nobel prize winning guru fact remains that the majority of tibet's residents have no desire and less interest to see the territory handed back to dalai lama of india, full stop. you are in favor of democracy? no? how is the logic flawed?