Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (17037)	10/18/2007 7:31:03 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

LIAR. Carter had no way of stopping Iranian extremists from overwhelming the corrupt and mortally ill Shah of Iran. You are completely ignorant of history to make a statement like that. But again, the rightwing encourages ignorance of history and replacing facts with rightwing myths and smears. Carter may have made a few mistakes but he definitely couldn't have saved the Shah. And what was so worthy about the Shah anyway? He bought billions of dollars worth of US arms and wasn't a communist. So what? He was a dictator. I though you Bushies hated dictators. And pray-tell, if there were something the US presdient could have done to overthrow the Iranian revolution, why didn't Reagn do it instead of arming the iranian extremists the way he did using Ollie North as his arms trafficker.