Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (17042)	10/19/2007 6:58:03 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224750

I've already posted evidence that Carter deliberately undercut the Shah. It was part of Brzezinski's Green Revolution strategy. what was so worthy about the Shah anyway? He bought billions of dollars worth of US arms and wasn't a communist. He was a strong pro-western force in the region capable of keeping the straits open and thugs like Saddam in line. So what? He was a dictator. I though you Bushies hated dictators. Heredity monarch actually. And pray-tell, if there were something the US presdient could have done to overthrow the Iranian revolution, why didn't Reagn do it instead of arming the iranian extremists the way he did using Ollie North as his arms trafficker. Thuggish regimes are hard to overthrow. Just like Iran's today.