Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (246497)	10/24/2007 3:53:40 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

"It's not even a question that is being discussed anymore." An Iran nuke? ok it could happen and probably will as a matter of time and global circumstance if nothing else. At the current rate of countries interested in nukes it will be status quo before long. That's why I threw out the 'head fake' topic for discussion. Iran could end up with a bomb but for what benefit? Negligible if any. What benefit does it get out of thumbing its nose at us? loads and loads. In the mean time all the things I stated are true with or without a bomb. Do you think they like us paying attention to the short pass that could be intercepted, fumbled, or completed for no gain while they have a guy dancing in the end zone?