To: Mike Johnston who wrote (88164 ) 10/30/2007 1:12:12 PM From: benwood Respond to of 110194 "Many poor signed up for those loans out of pure desperation, afraid of further government-sponsored hyperinflation" Mike, The poor by definition are likely to live paycheck to paycheck and also have very little anything which will erode away. Seriously, they have little to fear, inflation or not, unless it causes their jobs to vanish. Should hyperflation "stick" then they will get annual or semiannual raises, just as in the mid 70s through late 80s. I posit that there was not a single solitary person as you described (desperate because they recognized the nascent signs of hyperinflation, which most learned people *now* -- 1 to 3 years later -- still do not recognize). If there was any desperation, it was that they were missing yet another train to riches leaving the station. A last chance to get wealthy the easy way. In other words, based on greed, the usual suspect in manias and money for nothing schemes. For most, there wasn't desperation, just the realization it was a no-lose proposition in which if they could not handle the increased payments, they'd either sell for a big profit or just live free a while and then get evicted. Either way, they'd come out ahead of where they had been paying rent every month, and they'd live in a better home a minimum of three years. If we do get into a sustained period of hyperinflation, expect unions to become stronger again and expect automatic COLAs to become a common contract item. As Volker knew, when COLAs become common, then high inflation is systemic and must more difficult to eradicate. The ones to lose the most in hyperinflation are the middle class, for they have more wealth but less "ownership" and so they will be behind the curve all the way. The upper class will do fine because they own the bulk of the inflating assets. The poor will do fine because their paycheck to paycheck continues to grow (but with a lag -- they won't get off scott free but comparatively they will).