Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (23896)	11/1/2007 6:06:08 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

I'm not sure why the rights would have to be part of the constitution, as long as they where in statue law, and the statue law did not exceed the constitutional powers of the legislature (state or federal) enacting the law. But you never really answered the question. I'll go back to my original phrasing. "Is the problem that there is such a declaration, or is the problem the specific legal rights and privileges that corporations have including those resulting from the declaration? If your answer is "both", than which is the most serious problem?"