SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/3/2007 1:00:02 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 149317
 
If Clinton suffered any real damage from the Tuesday night debate (other than giving the eventual Republican candidate a road map), it has not yet shown up in the polling numbers:

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

Saturday, November 03, 2007

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows Senator Hillary Clinton maintaining steady support in the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination. Clinton now earns 43% of the vote, while Barack Obama attracts 21%, John Edwards is preferred by 11%, and Bill Richardson is supported by 5%. No other candidate tops the 3% level among Likely Democratic Primary Voters (see recent daily numbers).

These results are based upon nightly telephone surveys and are reported on a four-day rolling average basis. Approximately three-quarters of the interviews for today’s update were conducted following Tuesday night’s Democratic debate. For the three nights following the debate, the results are Clinton 44%, Obama 22%, and Edwards 12%.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll is typically updated Monday through Friday. This special Saturday update is being released due to interest in the impact of Tuesday night’s debate. The next tracking poll update will be released Monday morning by noon Eastern. The Presidential Tracking Poll will be updated seven days a week beginning Saturday, December 1, 2007.

A separate analysis released yesterday noted that Clinton did not lose ground on the two days following the debate. Partly that’s because the audience was very small and many Americans were not paying attention. Clinton remains the unifying theme of Election 2008.

Clinton is currently viewed favorably by 78% of Democrats, Edwards by 67%, and Obama by 61%.

<snip>



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/3/2007 3:14:17 PM
From: zeta1961  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
Iowa Attorney General who also happens to be an Obama supporter requests that Hillary release all pertinent White House letters..

Letter to Senator Clinton on Archive Records from Obama Iowa Supporters Tom Miller and Lu Barron

November 3, 2007

Dear Senator Clinton:

Yesterday, it was reported that the Clinton presidential library will not release the public schedules from your tenure as First Lady until late January - several weeks after Iowa Democrats have participated in the January 3rd caucuses. Other records documenting your time in Washington won’t be made public until long after millions of Democrats have cast their vote to choose our nominee, because of the request to have documents reviewed by Bruce Lindsey prior to their release.

Throughout this campaign, you have repeatedly emphasized your experience as First Lady. However, by refusing to authorize an expedited release of the records from your time in Washington, you are preventing the Iowa voters from thoroughly reviewing that experience.

We ask you to demonstrate your commitment to turning the page on political tactics that routinely block the American public’s right to know what their government is doing and has done.

We’re backing Barack Obama because he has repeatedly demonstrated a commitment to a transparent government. That’s why he has released his personal income tax returns, made his Senate appropriations earmarks public, and led the effort to establish a “Google for Government” initiative that requires the entire federal budget to be posted online in a publicly available and searchable format.

As Americans and as Democrats ready for change, we’re asking you to be as open as possible with the American people. You should publicly request that the tens of thousands of pages that have been cleared for release by the National Archives be immediately provided to the public, and ask for the expedited release of all records requested from the Clinton Library in advance of the Iowa Caucuses.

As Iowans, we understand that what makes our first-in-the-nation caucus unique is the opportunity to carefully examine each of the candidates and their records before making a decision about whom to support. Fully releasing these records is in keeping with the spirit of the process that makes the Iowa Caucus so special.

Sincerely,

Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, Co-Chair of Obama’s Iowa campaign

Linn County Supervisor Lu Barron



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/4/2007 5:27:33 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Oregon Senate candidate Steve Novick follows on the NYT piece today by commending Obama's balanced positioning on how to deal with Iran:

openleft.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/4/2007 11:14:32 AM
From: zeta1961  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
Another illustration of the disconnect I've seen in other places regarding Hillary/Obama support.

Metro Atlanta is also where Obama's fund-raising has been most successful. Last month, Clinton snagged the endorsement of civil rights icon John Lewis, naming the Atlanta congressman one of her national campaign chairmen.

But within Lewis' 5th District, Obama has raised twice as much money as Clinton — $637,691 — from three times as many donors, according to a ZIP code analysis of FEC records.


ajc.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/5/2007 11:53:51 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Starting Gate: Clinton Opponents Latch Onto Credibility Issue

cbsnews.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/6/2007 11:10:57 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
THE TIME-TO-MAKE-THE-DOUGHNUTS CANDIDATE

news.yahoo.com

By Tedd Rall

Mon Nov 5, 7:57 PM ET

NEW YORK--"The fact that a lot of people dislike you is troubling," says the director of the Quinnipiac University poll, talking about Hillary Clinton (D-Carpetbagger, Slept Her Way Into National Prominence, NY). She scores 47 percent of likely Democratic primary voters, leaving Barack Obama (21 percent) and John Edwards (12 percent) in the dust. This is supposed to make her inevitable. Why bother to hold primaries? But a funny thing happens when Democrats and Republicans talk about 2008: they find common ground.

"I can't stand Hillary," the Republican opens.

"She's disgusting," the Democrat agrees. At last, a Uniter.

Half the electorate hates her--and not just members of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. She's a juggernaut, at least in a Howard Dean-in-November 2003 kind of way. Liberals will vote for her if she's the nominee. But it'll be a chore. She epitomizes joylessness. Win or lose, who cares?

She's the time-to-make-the-doughnuts candidate.

Every voter has his or her limit, a moment or an act or just a general sense about a politician that makes the idea of voting for them feel so unpleasant they'd rather cross party lines, or stay home on election day. For me, and for a lot of people, it was Hillary's vote to declare Iran's Revolutionary Guards a "foreign terrorist organization," unleashing new sanctions and U.S. military "instruments"--a step toward war--against Iran.

I forgive easily. I could have let Hillary off the hook for supporting NAFTA, screwing up healthcare in 1993 and voting for the proto-fascist USA-Patriot Act. I could have overlooked her Reaganesque cluelessness about the lives of ordinary people. (Reneging on her "baby bond" proposal that Americans receive $5,000 at age 18, she now wants to give everyone a 401(k) and have the government match it "up to $1,000." Thanks to this windfall, she says, "they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that down payment on their first home." Lame idea, obviously. What I want to know is: Where can you buy a house or a college education for $1000? On the moon?)

I might have even have forgiven Hillary's vote to authorize Bush to start the unprovoked war against Iraq, though she never apologized for a cowardly (and miscalculated) act of triangulation that contributed to the deaths of more than a million Iraqis. As Tim Grieve wrote in Salon: "She has gone from 1) voting for the use-of-force resolution, to 2) questioning the intelligence that formed the basis of that vote, to 3) arguing that the Bush administration distorted the intelligence, to 4) saying she didn't regret giving Bush authority to use force but did regret the way he used that authority, to 5) saying the resolution never would have come to a vote if Congress knew then what it knows now, to 6) saying that Congress wouldn't have voted for the resolution if Congress knew then what it knows now, to 7) saying that she wouldn't have voted for the resolution if she knew then what she knows now."

Hillary's October 2003 speech to the Senate is a fair summary of her defense: "The idea of giving our president authority to act...against Saddam Hussein, was one I could support and I did so. In the last year, however, I have been first perplexed, then surprised, then amazed, and even outraged and always frustrated by the implementation of the authority given the president by this Congress." Good idea, fouled up by hyper-aggression and lousy implementation. Well, what did she expect? Bush was a warmonger, a liar who'd already attacked Afghanistan, where Osama wasn't, and sucked up to Pakistan, where he was, after 9/11. She gave him a blank check. She can't have been surprised when he cashed it.

As I said, I'm the forgiving type. I get it: Hillary can't apologize for her Iraq vote. It would make her look weak. As she said in September 2006 on ABC News, "I can only look at what I knew at the time because I don't think you get do-overs in life. I think you have to take responsibility. And hopefully, learn from it and go forward. I regret very much the way the president used the authority he was given because I think he misled the Congress, and he misled the country."

Except...except...she did get a do-over. The same president who misled her, Congress and the country, asked for her vote on yet another resolution based on phony intelligence that starts us down the path to war--this time against Iran. She had a chance to prove that she'd learned her lesson. She voted yes. Again.

President Hillary won't close Gitmo. She won't stop torturing. She won't stop listening to our phone calls. She won't stop the war in Iraq, much less in Afghanistan. Heck, she might even start a new one.

Fool you once, shame on Bush. Fool you twice, I stop thinking how cool it would be for the United States to finally elect a woman president.

(Ted Rall is the author of the new book "Silk Road to Ruin: Is Central Asia the New Middle East?," an in-depth prose and graphic novel analysis of America's next big foreign policy challenge.)



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/9/2007 7:59:05 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Obama: "people are paying attention"

radioiowa.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/10/2007 2:55:10 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Barack Obama and the Dream of a Color-Blind America
______________________________________________________________

By JONATHAN KAUFMAN
The Wall Street Journal
November 10, 2007; Page A1

Isaiah Oliver, a 24-year-old white social worker, grew up in this overwhelmingly white city and attended the predominantly white University of Richmond in Virginia. Ask him why he supports Barack Obama and he says it's because of the candidate's race.

"Because he's black it makes me want to believe that he will change things," says Mr. Oliver, leaving an Obama campaign rally here. "It feels like you are part of something that's starting to change American politics. It's the cool factor. He's a rock star."

As he campaigns across the country, Sen. Obama, the son of a black father and a white mother, is both revealing and tapping into a changed racial landscape, especially among younger whites. After decades of often bitter polarization and racial tension on issues ranging from the spread of civil rights to affirmative action, many whites say they are drawn to Sen. Obama precisely because they think his mixed-race background reflects America's increasingly diverse population and projects a more optimistic vision of the country's racial future.

Sen. Obama's candidacy, whether it succeeds or not, appears to mark a turning point in race and politics in America: It is prompting significant numbers of white Americans to consider voting for him not despite his racial background, but because of it.

"Obama is running an emancipating campaign," says Bob Tuke, who is white and is the former chairman of the Tennessee Democratic party. "He is emancipating white voters to vote for a black candidate."

Sean Briscoe, a 24-year-old white who writes a political blog in Nashville, is one: "Obama doesn't come with the baggage of the civil-rights movement, focusing entirely on the race issue," he says. "He went from Hawaii to Indonesia. He has been in all these places where you get an appreciation for people who aren't like you."

Two decades ago, Jesse Jackson broke new ground by challenging whites to consider a black mounting a serious run for the presidency. Now Sen. Obama and a new generation of black candidates are running campaigns that make whites feel good about themselves. These younger black politicians, including Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick and Tennessee Senate candidate Harold Ford Jr., are, like Sen. Obama, seen by many whites as proof of the country's racial progress -- and their own.

Sen. Obama "doesn't steer away from race but makes sure that everything he does is influenced by his bi-racial identity," says Harvard Law School professor Charles Ogletree, who knew Mr. Obama as a law student and is advising the campaign.

"Obama has learned the lessons of [the failed candidacies] of Jackson and [Rev. Al] Sharpton, and married that with the smoothness of Colin Powell," says Scott Reed, a Republican strategist. "He has triangulated against all of them."

Sen. Obama continues to trail Sen. Hillary Clinton by substantial margins in national polls. Even with white support, he could become the equivalent of Eugene McCarthy in 1968 or Howard Dean in 2004, candidates who stirred fervor among white college students and intellectuals but were unable to win the nomination.

Sen. Obama and his campaign aides declined to be interviewed for this story. But his own writings and conversations with people who know him suggest his approach is both politically savvy and rooted in his own experiences.

He has always lived between two worlds. He is the son of a mother from Kansas and an African father, who separated when he was two years old. He lived in Indonesia for a time as a child, when his mother married an Indonesian, and then with his white grandparents in Hawaii. He excelled at elite institutions such as Columbia University and Harvard Law School, then worked in a black Chicago neighborhood. Friends say that double life has affected not just his personality but also his politics.

"Obama knows this is a majority white country," says Mary Pattillo, an African-American professor at Northwestern University who has known Sen. Obama for years. "He is acutely aware how his discussion of race and racial politics will be interpreted and received by whites. We who work in the white world are always mindful of not making whites feel threatened. You can't get angry as a black person working in white America. To get a message across, black professionals are always thinking about the perfect balance of assertiveness and non-threateningness."

Unlike Sen. Clinton, who regularly invokes the history-making achievement she could make by becoming the first woman president, Sen. Obama rarely mentions race directly in his campaign speeches.

Here in Portland, he emphasizes the "core decency of the American people" and his experience "bringing people together to get things done." He ends with a story about meeting an elderly woman in a small town in South Carolina who asked him if he was "fired up" and "ready to go" -- leading to a call and response chant that brings the crowd to its feet. Sen. Obama never mentions that the woman and the town are black.

"Barack is aimed at trying to get as much of the white vote as he can in order to win," says Ronald Walters, former campaign manager for Jesse Jackson's presidential campaign. The challenge facing black candidates like Sen. Obama who have national ambitions, says Mr. Walters, "isn't whether they're black enough. It's whether they're white enough."

Race remains a wild card in American politics. Candidates such as Mr. Ford, who narrowly lost the Senate race in Tennessee last year, have often come close to election only to find race flaring at the last minute to blunt their momentum.

"Obama knows that just because people are saying one thing doesn't mean they will vote that way," says Tim King, the African-American head of a charter school in Chicago who has known Sen. Obama for a decade. "No one ever really knows what people do once they close the curtain in the voting booth."

Sen. Obama's popularity among whites also stirs uneasiness among many blacks. In the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll1, Sen. Obama trails Sen. Clinton among black voters 46% to 37%.

"There is a lot of debate [among blacks] over how appealing Obama is to white folks," says Mr. King. "People are saying, 'Is he too likeable to white people?"'

"Obama doesn't really push people to consider what diversity really is," says Alfred DeFreece, a black teacher at Eastern Michigan University, who says many of his white students favor Obama. "He is close enough to what is a tolerated white norm, very much what is palatable and acceptable and good." Mr. DeFreece says he wonders whether Sen. Obama would be able to aggressively push social programs that help blacks in poverty and end discrimination.

At the same time, Mr. DeFreece also reflects the country's changing racial landscape. The woman he lives with is white.

Sen. Obama's rise reflects the ways American race relations have changed in the past 40 years -- the expansion of the black middle class, the rise of blacks to positions of prominence in business, academia and government, and a general lessening of racial tension.

About 75% of whites and 55% of blacks describe black-white relations as "somewhat good or very good," according to a recent Gallup poll. About 75% of whites and 85% of blacks say they support interracial marriage. In the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, 63% of registered voters said they believe voters are prepared to elect a qualified African-American as president, a dramatic increase from 1986 when just 29% said they thought America was ready to elect a black president. In the current poll, just 46% of voters say voters today are ready to elect a qualified Hispanic as president and 38% a qualified Mormon.

Sen. Obama runs stronger among younger voters who are at the forefront of many of these changing attitudes, from their embrace of hip-hop music to the diversity they encounter on college campuses. And he runs strongest among whites in their 30s and 40s who have lived through the racial changes of the past decades.

In the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, Sen. Obama trails Sen. Clinton among Democratic primary voters by 22 percentage points overall -- and by virtually the same amount among white voters alone. But his deficit is smaller -- 46% to 32% -- among voters aged 18 to 34 and he runs even with Sen. Clinton among voters aged 35-49. By contrast, he trails Sen. Clinton among voters over 50 by more than 30 points.

"I've met people who reminded me of Obama at high school," says Mae Mouk, a white 24-year-old assistant in a Washington, D.C., law firm who grew up in Baton Rouge, La. "I have dated outside my race. I had friends in high school and college who were in interracial relationships. I look at race differently than my grandparents and parents."

Most whites, of course, still live in largely segregated neighborhoods and have attended predominantly white schools. Even on more-diverse college campuses, blacks and whites tend to live in separate worlds. But many young whites pride themselves on being open-minded and on having been exposed to the rhetoric and reality of diversity.

"I don't see race as a big issue," says Mr. Briscoe, the Nashville blogger. "Most younger people can go in between the different communities and can get along with people of different backgrounds. It's a more multicultural way of life. I have friends of all different colors. I can listen to rap music."

Sen. Obama "is a citizen of the world," says David Bartholomew, a white law student at Boston College Law School. "Obama and my generation -- we see the future of the world as countries evolving together. Because of his background he can speak to a wider range of people than any other candidate. He can speak globally."

Younger voters like Mr. Briscoe and Mr. Bartholomew embrace Sen. Obama -- born in 1961 and too young to have marched with Martin Luther King Jr. -- as a post-Civil-Rights candidate. But his approach and campaign rhetoric consciously echo the hopeful spirit of the early civil rights days.

In his autobiography, written before he entered politics, Sen. Obama tells the story of his Kenyan father drinking with friends at a bar in Hawaii when a white man objects to being in a bar "next to a n-."

"The room fell quiet and people turned to my father, expecting a fight," Sen. Obama recounts. "Instead, my father stood up, walked over to the man, smiled and proceeded to lecture him about the folly of bigotry, the promise of the American dream, and the universal rights of man." The white man ends up buying Sen. Obama's father a round of drinks.

In the book, Sen. Obama looks back wistfully to the early 1960s, a "fleeting period" that promised "a bright new world where differences of race or culture would instruct and amuse and perhaps even ennoble."

By the late 1960s, both the rhetoric and substance of the Civil Rights Movement had sharpened with the rise of Black Power and groups like the Black Panthers, who accused whites of being racists, leading to an eventual white backlash and decades of black-white hostility and anger.

"The secret to Martin Luther King was that he flattered white Americans that you are better than you think you are," says Shelby Steele, a black research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. "The very essence of Obama's appeal is the idea that he represents racial idealism -- the idea that race is something that America can transcend. That's a very appealing idea. A lot of Americans would truly love to find a black candidate they could comfortably vote for for President of the United States."

Richard Harpootlian, a white lawyer and former state chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, was in college in 1968 when King was assassinated. He recalls going down to Atlanta to walk in King's funeral cortege. "They played the 'I Have a Dream' speech with his line about judging his children not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character," Mr. Harpootlian recalls. On that day, "I thought we were never further away from that vision. When I met Barack Obama, I felt as I'd never felt before that he typifies what Dr. King was talking about."

At the Obama rally here, 17-year-old Nick Wright, a high school senior, is one of the few African-Americans in the crowded downtown arena. He sits at a table with a white classmate, welcoming people to the rally.

"Obama isn't just reaching out to the African-American community," says Eli Noll, the white classmate. "He's so much for the youth of America."

Mr. Wright nods in approval. "I just read about Malcolm X in English class," he says. "He had a lot of good things to say, but nobody listened because of some of the other things he said. Obama -- he doesn't have to be like Malcolm X."

Write to Jonathan Kaufman at jonathan.kaufman@wsj.com2

URL for this article:
online.wsj.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3117)11/10/2007 5:26:52 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
In search of Kennedy's endorsement
______________________________________________________________

By Scot Lehigh
Boston Globe Columnist
November 9, 2007

Let's say you're a political gumshoe and the question before you is this: Who does Edward M. Kennedy think would make the best president of the United States?

Other than Edward M. Kennedy, that is.

The state's senior senator has worked with nine presidents. And he has served in the Senate with six of the Democratic candidates. So his perspective would be well worth having.

A logical place to start would be by asking Kennedy himself. Ah, but there you would run into Stephanie Cutter, Kennedy's iron curtain, who would politely inform you that the senator is focused on Senate business, "is not likely to endorse at this time," and will not consent to an interview.

Now, a while back, when you mentioned you would like to talk to the senator about education policy, Ted was persistent as a telemarketer, peppering your voicemail with messages like this: "Ted Kennedy, 9:30 Saturday. Sorry to miss you."

A chance to spend a Saturday in June discussing voluntary national education benchmarks?

Sooo sorry to have missed you, too.

Still, you might suspect that Kennedy isn't focused on Senate business to the complete exclusion of the campaign. You might even remember that last December, when poor stumble-tongued John Kerry hoped to delay his own presidential decision, the better to weather his gaffe about Iraq, Kennedy made it clear that if Kerry kept dawdling, he might just back another candidate. Word was, Kennedy doubted Kerry would be viable if he kept waiting - and he wanted his endorsement to matter. And make no mistake: Kennedy's support counts for something. No one who saw him rally the faithful for Kerry in 2004 in Iowa or New Hampshire would doubt that. When the two appeared together, it was a case of the opening act upstaging the main attraction.

So you would be inclined to think that Kennedy is watching the current race pretty carefully. And then you might recollect that, in a profession where the salutation "my good friend" usually means, "I wouldn't dare turn my back on him if he had so much as a plastic fork in his hand," Kennedy really is famously close with Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut.

Why, with a little snooping, you might find that several people close to Kennedy are backing Dodd. People like, say, US Representative Patrick Kennedy and Edward M. Kennedy Jr., the senator's two sons.

"He is a terrific guy and he would be a great president," says Ted Jr., who has campaigned for Dodd in Iowa and New Hampshire.

And you might recall that in June, when Dodd proposed his national service program in Nashua, one of those at the event was Don Dowd, another of Ted's longtime friends, who is helping Dodd in New Hampshire. And further, that Kennedy insider Nick Littlefield has co-hosted a fund-raiser for Dodd's presidential bid. And that Kennedy's sister Eunice is a Dodd contributor.

"Eunice sent five grand to the campaign," Dodd tells me. "As Teddy likes to say, 'She never gave me $5,000.' " It was $4,600, actually, but you get the idea.

Now, these are adults with minds of their own. Still, it's hard to imagine they would have all coalesced around Dodd without a tacit blessing from Ted. So let's ask: What did the senator say when Ted Jr. told him he planned to support Dodd?

"He said, 'That's terrific,' " the son reports.

"He has a huge regard for Dodd," says a Kennedy confidant. "I think that's where his heart really is."

So why isn't Kennedy publicly backing his friend?

Here's one widely cited reason: Like Dodd, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are both on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, which Kennedy chairs - and committee comity is ever so important.

Then, some suggest, there's the matter of relevance. Kennedy likes to gets behind someone with a real shot at winning - and Dodd, despite his long years in the Senate, is barely registering in the polls, at least so far.

And yet, there's something noble about standing by your friends even when circumstances make it tricky or the going is tough. That's what Governor Patrick did when he endorsed Obama despite the Hillary headwinds, and you had to admire him for it.

And that's why you find yourself hoping that, whatever his concerns about committee collegiality and campaign clout, the Senate's liberal lion isn't going to start playing it safe at 75.