Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (356914)	11/4/2007 5:08:50 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573709

Ted, > It was nothing new......the media simply took advantage of it when he ran for governor. The timing of the story's release couldn't have been any dirtier. The LA Times could have released the story a month earlier without losing any of the details, yet they chose a time where they felt they could created the most shock and the most impact on the election results. Their excuse, of course, was that they needed more time to get all the facts of the story, but why couldn't they just publish the feature earlier, then do more stories when new facts (or new allegations) get uncovered? It is obvious why. Of course, you're only defending the LA Times and attacking Ah-nuld because he still calls himself a Republican, if only in name. Funny how Clinton never got such criticism from you. Maybe you think he's "suffered" enough at the hands of the GOP ... Tenchusatsu