Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (357015)	11/5/2007 2:10:56 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573718

Ted, > It was nothing new......the media simply took advantage of it when he ran for governor. The timing of the story's release couldn't have been any dirtier. The LA Times could have released the story a month earlier without losing any of the details, yet they chose a time where they felt they could created the most shock and the most impact on the election results. If I remember correctly, a couple of the women he was alleged to have abused came forward to embarrass him. What was the paper to do.....look the other way? Of course, you're only defending the LA Times and attacking Ah-nuld because he still calls himself a Republican, if only in name. Funny how Clinton never got such criticism from you. Maybe you think he's "suffered" enough at the hands of the GOP ... I criticized Arnold because he had no credentials to be governor; not because he was a Republican. I know the difference between a Bush/Cheney Republican and a CA Republican. As I saw it, his entire first term was a learning experience where he learned on the job and you paid for his training. He got away with it because he was a celebrity. If I were still a resident of CA, I would have been very pissed.