Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (25076)	11/11/2007 10:10:09 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217786

you seem to be paving for the 'stage left' when UN authority lapses in a few weeks in any case, in the mean time - invasion was a fact - occupation generally happens after invasion, as long as the invading troops stayed on - puppet regime is alway available and set forth once occupation is underway, and the fact that puppets can issue invitation to invaders is taken as a matter of course and for granted - subjugation fails whenever insurgents get organized to drive out invaders ... and this is where we are now at, until further developments the intensity of interest this iteration is that we have a war where one side is determined to not lose, at any and all cost, for a long time, and the other side intends to win, at any and all cost, forever if necessary; and loss for one side simply means fight another day, and loss for the other means game effectively over, player one the drama is incredible, and we get to watch it on TV, and because one or the other side will lose, even if it takes a long time.