Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (2890)	11/14/2007 11:00:42 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

You might consider it a bad argument (I don't but I'm sure you do) but its not a circular one. It isn't relying on its own conclusion as a premise, even if it has an unstated premise that you disagree with.

To: Road Walker who wrote (2890)	11/14/2007 1:11:08 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 42652

Plus, larger volume equals lower cost per unit... That works for products, for services, not so much. I'm sort of getting tired of the circular argument... And I'm getting tired of the lack of focus. <g> What I said is valid, all other things being equal. You introduced a new factor, the elimination of the insurance element. That has nothing to do with the universality thread, which was the topic at hand. I've already agreed with you that reform is needed in the clutter of insurance vehicles. That would be a cost saver. But it's peripheral to the universality matter.