Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (154743)	11/19/2007 3:50:51 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 225578

At present nuclear is the best alternative for making a major impact and I hate saying that! I remember talks of the next ice age in the 70's. I believe in weather cycles and there's loads of proof that suggests that's what we're seeing. But I don't think its a bad idea to watch things, research things and make sure we're doing the right thing. People can chuckle all they want about global warming and make light of it. It's probably a cycle IMO. However, knowing that we need to make changes to better fuel sources, why not try and improve the pollution situation at the same time?