SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (360822)11/30/2007 2:42:15 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574340
 
Just as I said.....when its democratic....socialism does restrict freedoms.

You got that right, but I think you meant to say something different.


Yes. When its democratically based, socialism does not restrict freedoms.

Enforced capitalism would bear the same result.

Enforce capitalism would be a really odd beast.


It seems odd to you because you are not used to thinking that way.

Capitalism is the operation of the free market. If you try to force it its not really a free market. Going to some commune with guns and saying "you all have to buy and sell from each other and keep your profits and property separate" wouldn't be capitalism.

Going to some American city with guns, and demanding that people share everything is equally as odd and probably against the law.

As for Poland's unemployment rate

"The euro area
1
(EA13) seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate
2
stood at 7.3% in September 2007, compared to
7.4% in August


Okay, Tim, I gave you a link directly to GUS..the Polish office that determines unemployment statistics. They are the ones who came up with 11%. The 8.8% rate is the EU's interpretation. If I had to wager a bet, I would go with GUS.

Secondly, we know that young Poles have been leaving Poland in droves because they can't find a job or they can't find a decent job.

Thirdly, even if the EU is right, a near 9% unemployment rate is still very bad.

Fourthly, some dude complains that Poles are double dipping, claiming to be unemployed when they are really working in the UK. Well if that's true, why don't they crack down on the double dipping? Strange they would complain about it, accusing their fellows Poles of dishonesty and yet they do nothing about it. Sounds fishy to me.

Fifthly, the wayward Pole....in France its the Polish plumber.....is the new stud in European soap operas. Its very common to see Poles working everywhere in Europe but Poland.

Sixthly, the Poles were so fed up with their economy they kicked out the incumbents in their recent elections:
theindependent.com

Seventhly, the incumbants were the equivalent of Polish Republicans.......much loved by the Bushies. That alone should tell you they didn't know what the hell they were doing with the economy.

So now we are left with these robust GDP growth figures for the last two years while the unemployment rate remains stubbornly high, the Polish people are very unhappy and the Poles are looking for work all over Europe. How much do you want to bet the Polish GOPers lied.....I mean fudged the GDP numbers a bit? Yup. I think therein lies the problem. ;-)



To: TimF who wrote (360822)11/30/2007 1:25:54 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574340
 
Contrary to the argument that mandatory pollution cuts would harm the economy, the business leaders' petition says ambitious emissions reductions would "create significant business opportunities."

"You've got businesses around the world saying, 'Give us certainty so we can do what's right for our investors, society at large and the broader environment,'" said Richard Barrington, head of sustainability for Sun Microsystems in the United Kingdom and Ireland, whose boss signed the petition. "If you look at the risks associated with climate change, they're just as much business risks as they are human risks."

-----------------------------------------

Business leaders seek action on warming By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer
Thu Nov 29, 10:42 PM ET

Some of the world's top business leaders are demanding that international diplomats meeting next week come up with drastic and urgent measures to cut greenhouse gas pollution at least in half by 2050.

Officials from more than 150 global companies — worth nearly $4 trillion in market capitalization — have signed a petition urging "strong, early action on climate change" when political leaders meet in Indonesia.

The hastily prepared petition drive, coordinated through the environmental office of Britain's Prince Charles, is signed by leaders from mainstream powerhouse companies such as Shell UK, GE International, Coca-Cola Co., Dupont Co., United Technologies Corp., Rolls Royce, Nestle SA, Unilever, British Airways and Volkswagen AG.

The petition is aimed at the United Nations conference in Bali, convened to draft a new environmental treaty to replace the Kyoto accord, which expires in 2012.

"We urge world leaders to seize this opportunity," the petition says.

Contrary to the argument that mandatory pollution cuts would harm the economy, the business leaders' petition says ambitious emissions reductions would "create significant business opportunities."

"You've got businesses around the world saying, 'Give us certainty so we can do what's right for our investors, society at large and the broader environment,'" said Richard Barrington, head of sustainability for Sun Microsystems in the United Kingdom and Ireland, whose boss signed the petition. "If you look at the risks associated with climate change, they're just as much business risks as they are human risks."


In the three weeks that the business leaders circulated the petition, primarily in the United Kingdom, Europe, the United States and Australia, more than 80 percent of the giant firms contacted agreed to join in, said petition coordinator Craig Bennett, of the University of Cambridge's Programme for Industry.

Just how drastic the cuts in man-made greenhouse gas emissions — carbon dioxide is the main one, generated mostly from the use of coal and oil products — should be left up to science, the business leaders said. But their communique refers to a recent international report on climate change, which said a 50 percent cut in emissions by 2050 is needed to prevent catastrophic global warming. Barrington said "that's the minimum order of what we're looking for."

"It's a massive problem for humanity; it's a huge problem for our businesses," Bennett said. "The politicians have got to sit up and do something."

In January, the CEO's of 10 major U.S. companies urged President Bush to support mandatory industrial greenhouse gas emission cuts. The White House is against that policy. Since their January plea, the industry group, the United States Climate Action Partnership, has grown to include 27 of the world's largest firms.

Other companies signing the British-based petition include Nike Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Virgin Group, Barclays PLC, Gap, Nokia, Pacific Gas and Electric, and the Rupert Murdoch-owned News Corp., which runs the conservative Fox News Channel.

"There are voices that you may not normally expect to be heard on this particular issue," Barrington said. "It just shows how concerned we are about the issue."

___

On the Net:

The Bali communique is at balicommunique.com

United States Climate Action Partnership: us-cap.org



To: TimF who wrote (360822)12/1/2007 1:44:28 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574340
 
Poll Finds Americans Pessimistic, Want Change

War, Economy, Politics Sour Views of Nation's Direction

By Dan Balz and Jon Cohen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 4, 2007; Page A01

One year out from the 2008 election, Americans are deeply pessimistic and eager for a change in direction from the agenda and priorities of President Bush, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Concern about the economy, the war in Iraq and growing dissatisfaction with the political environment in Washington all contribute to the lowest public assessment of the direction of the country in more than a decade. Just 24 percent think the nation is on the right track, and three-quarters said they want the next president to chart a course that is different than that pursued by Bush.

Overwhelmingly, Democrats want a new direction, but so do three-quarters of independents and even half of Republicans. Sixty percent of all Americans said they feel strongly that such a change is needed after two terms of the Bush presidency.

Dissatisfaction with the war in Iraq remains a primary drag on public opinion, and Americans are increasingly downcast about the state of the economy. More than six in 10 called the war not worth fighting, and nearly two-thirds gave the national economy negative marks. The outlook going forward is also bleak: About seven in 10 see a recession as likely over the next year.

The overall landscape tilts in the direction of the Democrats, but there is evidence in the new poll -- matched in conversations with political strategists in both parties and follow-up interviews with survey participants -- that the coming battle for the White House is shaping up to be another hard-fought, highly negative and closely decided contest.

At this point, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), the Democratic front-runner, holds the edge in hypothetical match-ups with four of the top contenders for the Republican nomination. But against the two best-known GOP candidates, former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), her margins are far from comfortable. Not one of the leading candidates in either party has a favorable rating above 51 percent in the new poll.

And while Clinton finds herself atop all candidates in terms of strong favorability -- in the poll, 28 percent said they feel strongly favorable toward her -- she also outpaces any other candidate on strong unfavorables. More than a third, 35 percent, have strongly negative views of her, more than 10 points higher than any other contender.

Overall, the public's sour mood is evident not only in the desire for a change in direction but also in assessments of those who control the reins of power in Washington. For the fourth consecutive month, Bush's approval rating remains at a career low. Thirty-three percent said they approve of the job he is doing, and 64 percent disapprove. Majorities have disapproved of Bush's job performance for more than 2 1/2 years.

In follow-up interviews, people were quick to find fault with what they see in Washington and to express their desire for something different. "I think Bush has been extremely polarizing to the country," said Amber Welsh, a full-time mother of three young children who lives in Davis, Calif. "While I think it started before Bush, I think Bush has pushed it even further. I think the next president needs to be one who brings us together as a country."

Democrats can take little comfort in Bush's numbers, however. A year after voters turned Republicans out of power in the House and the Senate, approval of the Democratic-controlled Congress's performance is lower than the president's rating, registering just 28 percent. That is the lowest since November 1995, when Republicans controlled Congress and the capital was paralyzed in a budgetary fight that shut down the government.

Congressional Democrats now fare just slightly better. Only 36 percent of those surveyed approve of the way they are handling their jobs, down sharply from April when, 100 days into the new Congress, 54 percent said they approved.

Whatever their dissatisfaction with the Democrats, however, a majority of Americans, 54 percent, said they want the party to emerge from the 2008 election in control of Congress; 40 percent would prefer the GOP to retake power. One reason is that 32 percent approve of congressional Republicans, and in a series of other measures it becomes clear that the eventual Republican nominee for president may be burdened by a tarnished party label in the general election.

CONTINUED 1 2 3 Next >

washingtonpost.com



To: TimF who wrote (360822)12/1/2007 1:55:29 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574340
 
Why no crackdown? There is no gov't oversight....its common knowledge that the Bush administration is made up of free market advocates and very pro business. Its why this crap started in the first place. And even after the disaster its spawned, still Bush does nothing to stop it. All part of the anti Christ movement in this country.

Reprieve for the 'Piggybackers': Still No Credit-Score Crackdown

By Kenneth R. Harney
Saturday, November 3, 2007; Page F01

"Piggyback" credit-score-inflation schemes for mortgage applicants haven't been reined in, despite industry pledges to do so at the end of the summer. As a result, lenders continue to be misled into treating loan applicants with poor credit as prime-credit candidates, worsening already critical delinquency problems in the mortgage market.

Fair Isaac, developer of the FICO score widely used for home-loan underwriting, confirmed that its "FICO '08" scoring model is not yet available at the three national credit bureaus. The new model, announced with fanfare in June as an antidote to piggybacking, was to have been activated in September at one of the bureaus, Experian.


But Experian says it has no firm time table to make the model available. The two other bureaus, Equifax and TransUnion, are not scheduled to receive the model until next year, according to Craig Watts, a Fair Isaac spokesman.

The piggybacking problem involves Internet-based firms that "rent" high-quality credit account histories to people with bad credit. Web sites claim to be able to raise consumers' scores by 100 to 200 points, or more, in 30 to 90 days. They do this by paying credit card holders with excellent payment histories to open their accounts to authorized users, who are charged, sometimes $1,000 to $2,000, for the privilege.

Once listed as an authorized user -- even with no physical access to the Visa or MasterCard itself -- the positive credit history of the cardholder flows through to the credit files of the piggybacker. Consumers with FICO scores in the mid-500s can add multiple authorized-user accounts to their files, promoters claim, and boost their scores into the mid-700s.

Loan officers processing mortgage applications typically would be none the wiser. They assume the FICO scores they receive are legitimate, and they quote applicants the appropriate interest rate. A FICO of 750, for example, would qualify the applicant for the lowest interest rates from most lenders.

Credit and mortgage experts say piggybacking score inflation is contributing to the unusually high rate of delinquencies and foreclosures now roiling the financial markets.

Lenders have complained to Congress, state banking regulators and the Federal Trade Commission about piggybacking for more than a year, but to date there have been no crackdowns on promoters. Some regulators privately concede that the piggybacking schemes are exploiting a loophole in the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

read more........

washingtonpost.com