SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (230336)12/4/2007 5:56:49 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793840
 
Bad analogy. People have the right to experiment with embryonic stem cells. The only thing at issue there is do they have a right to Federal tax dollars to support it. If it makes you feel better, I don't think the Federal government should buy guns or abortions for people who have the right to one but can't afford it either. That's one thing I differ with Rudy on.

Try again.



To: Lane3 who wrote (230336)12/4/2007 11:02:42 PM
From: ManyMoose  Respond to of 793840
 
Oh please. If such a right were protected in the constitution, we all know you would fight to keep it alive.

In point of fact, if it were a right protected in the Bill of Rights, it should remain in place without constant meddling by people who don't agree with stem cell fiddling.


So what happens to that right if it's determined that other than embryonic stem cells work just as well? Does the right to fiddle with them still stand?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News