Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (250827)	12/6/2007 3:28:54 PM
From: Ruffian	Respond to of 281500

<This is like stategic blunder #2 for nadine. The first one was her call for war with the USSR in 1945.> i think N. has a point many historians have also considered, i know i did................Churchill did for sure..............i would be so hasty to say she is off base on this 1................imho.............

To: michael97123 who wrote (250827)	12/6/2007 3:30:12 PM
From: Ruffian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

why is it the wars we lose, are due to political discourse by the left and dems?...........never Rep..........

To: michael97123 who wrote (250827)	12/6/2007 4:12:50 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

mike, don't buy into the stupidity of the Left that says Iran can't be an enemy because only Bush is an enemy. Nobody else can do anything, only big bad America. Or should that be Amerikkka? Second, will you get off the 1945 thing? All I said - with complete historical accuracy - is that many parts of the US Army and fp establishment favored war with the USSR in 1946 while the US had nukes but USSR didn't, and that the result might have improved the history of Eastern Europe post WWII. You don't think that Eastern Europe had a happy history from 1945 to 1990, do you? You agree they would have preferred to share the fate of Western Europe, don't you?