SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcos who wrote (54106)12/11/2007 7:45:52 PM
From: ogi  Respond to of 78419
 
Oh Yea, I am an illusionist, Gqc is worth holding on FA. I had a huge pile and sold when it broke down, it recovered everything then sold off again on results. I do not fool myself into thinking I can trade those movements. The breakdown was enough, I had way too much on the line and I still have time to get in if I deem it needed.

I bought CPQ because what is indicated makes it cheap even here. Can't afford 100 K shares or anything, wish I had it at .35:):) But I am prepared to see this exploration unveil itself for a bit. Management have the credentials and initial indications mean decent grade, cheap metallurgy, so the rest is size.

I am checking that out:)



To: marcos who wrote (54106)12/11/2007 9:30:33 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78419
 
- cpq.v - missed it, didn't want to chase above a loonie, now it's above two loonies

Fairly valued now. But next results or potential of next results could carry it higher.



To: marcos who wrote (54106)12/12/2007 11:13:16 AM
From: loantech  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78419
 
I am now wondering about your posts about gaps................