Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (362537)	12/13/2007 12:23:58 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586839

Checks and balances, or the separation of powers, is based upon the philosophy of Baron de Montesquieau. Locke also taught the necessity of checks and balances and he preceded Montesquieau and influenced him. Montesquieau wrote of the concept but certainly didn't originate it. Locke was from another era. I don't think the FF chose checks and balances from a religious perspective. I know Jefferson and Madison didn't: Representative government, Jefferson knew, still filled the Capitol with something less than a flock of saints, something more like a collection of men who, no matter how pure their motives at first, will be tempted to exercise unrighteous dominion at last. Thus, the democratic form, in and of itself, is no security against tyranny. “One hundred and seventy-three despots would surely be as oppressive as one. ... As little will it avail us that they are chosen by ourselves. An elective despotism was not the government we fought for,” he wrote. (2) He was referring to the tyranny of the majority. “The concentrating [of the legislative, executive and judicial powers] in the same hands is precisely the definition of despotic government. It will be no alleviation that these powers will be exercised by a plurality of hands, and not by a single one.” (3) It is not good enough to say we are free, not good enough to merely have government by consent. The people need to understand “the principles of free government,” and a successful experiment in government by consent will abide by those principles. Near the top of the list is this principle: “The powers of government should be so divided and balanced among several bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits, without being effectually checked and restrained by the others.”" (4) geocities.com James Madison was another strong proponent for checks and balances as well as separation of church and state. I doubt he saw checks and balances as a religious issue: <i"In 1784, Madison persuaded the Virginia legislature to enact Jefferson's “Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom.” He defeated Patrick Henry's proposal that the state subsidize the Anglican church. Madison declared government money corrupts. Christianity, he noted, “flourished, not only without the support of human laws, but in spite of every opposition to them. . . .”" fee.org