Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (363218)	12/17/2007 1:15:21 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577075

CJ, > What is relevant is that there is money being put into the economy. Tax cuts do not represent "money being put into the economy." They represent government putting less of a drag on the free market. It is a recognition that the money is better spent when the money is left in the hands that earned it. You continue to confuse the two and equate government spending with "letting the market do its thing." No it is not letting the market do its thing. It is letting government decide how to spend the money. You think all that matters is that money gets circulated, especially from whom you think will just hoard it to whom you think really need it. Sorry, but I don't consider that "free market economics." > Yawn. If anyone is using a playbook, it is you. Right, Mr. "I know economics and you don't, did you really go to an Ivy League?" Standard tactic when you can't argue your point, but resort to strawmen and ad hominem attacks. Straight out of the liberal playbook. At least other liberals are "courageous" enough to directly address their retorts to me. Tenchusatsu