SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (252116)12/22/2007 3:44:23 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 281500
 
Here is a chance for you to contribute something to your country, aside from your hot air. Give it up for the boat.

If fuel prices keep rising, liposuction will pay for itself
Boat aims to set speed record ... powered by human fat
Posted by Adam Stein at 12:57 PM on 20 Dec 2007

Here's a nice PR gimmick (and by nice, I mean totally disgusting): power your monster "eco-boat" with biodiesel made from human fat:

You can also make biodiesel from tallow (animal fats), fish oil, seaweed and algae. In fact, in an extraordinary show of dedication to the project, the skipper, Pete Bethune, underwent liposuction, and the fat (all 100ml) was used to make a small amount of Biodiesel for Earthrace!
I think this mostly shows an extraordinary dedication to clever marketing. Unfortunately for the earth, Bethune isn't all that chubby, so he enlisted a few "big, fat people" (his words) to squeeze out four gallons of biodiesel. All in, this represents about 0.06 percent of the fuel Bethune will need to set the "Round the World Speed Record by a Powerboat."

But the boat is certainly cool. It's designed to pierce waves rather than ride over them. In tests, the boat has merrily burrowed under 40-foot monsters. Another fun fact: the boat comes equipped with an axe. If it tips, the crew will have to chop its way out.

Gimmicks aside, there actually is a highly credible way to turn body fat into a renewable energy source for transportation. The technology is low-cost and available in mass production today. Intrigued? Check it out:

gristmill.grist.org



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (252116)12/22/2007 3:47:15 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 281500
 
Debate: denied!
Climate skeptic plays hookey
Posted by Andrew Dessler at 2:59 PM on 18 Dec 2007

The great climate debate was supposed to be yesterday, but it was not to be. My opponent, Dr. Tim Ball, was a no-show. He knew the debate started at 2:00 p.m., but got the time zone wrong. After he figured that out, his phone stopped working. Go figure.

So it was just me, and I spent about 75 minutes answering questions that readers had left on Eric Berger's Sciguy site, as well as taking questions from the phone lines. Many of the questions were interesting and reasonable, and I very much appreciate the people that posed them.

However, what would a climate change debate be without a few wackos?

One caller asked (and later emailed me the same question):

I would like to know if you really believe you and others like you can manage the climate of this planet? As the Wizard of Oz found out, there are unforeseen consequences to your actions.
That's right, if the Wizard can't make good policy concerning flying monkeys, witches, and Judy Garland, what chance do we have of handling climate change? This caller will most definitely not like my suggestion that we geoengineer a cooler climate by sending up flying monkeys carrying mirrors to reflect sunlight back to space.

The last caller was also a doozy. I'm still not 100 percent sure what he was asking, but my response, describing how most scientists agree that climate change is real, triggered Godwin's law and brought the ubiquitous comparison between the IPCC and Nazis. Steve Hayword of AEI fame emailed me to say that he caught this exchange and described it as "a train wreck." It's definitely worth listening to.

I was also surprised at the venom some skeptics have reserved for the "scientific consensus." It almost seems as if the existence of a consensus among scientists is evidence that a scientific consensus doesn't exist. That doesn't make sense to me, but it must to them.

And as I was answering some of the more hostile questions, I started wondering how you convince someone of the reality of climate change who thinks everything you say is a lie. I don't think there's any way to have a meaningful and civil conversation in that context. Thus, there are some people that you simply can never convince.

It also drove home just how useless these kinds of "debates" really are. At this point, the public policy debate has really shifted to what we need to be doing rather than the reality of climate change. Trying to convince the remaining die-hard skeptics is a waste of time and effort. (I know that many Grist readers have been saying this for a while, and I guess I'm now on board.)

You can download a mp3 of the debate from the blogtalkradio site. Enjoy!
gristmill.grist.org



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (252116)12/22/2007 6:36:04 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I just realized it is not entirely your fault you are scientifically illiterate. Back when we were kids, girls didn't go into science or medicine. Then, the FSM -> Women's movement, and they cuold enter. God was so pleased he waved his magic finger and all the women in the country all of a sudden had their IQs increase by 30 or so points. (There were a few women in science and medicine, considered outlaws. The most famous is Marie Curie. She was invited to Stockholm for a Nobel Prize, but that was a police sting, and she was diasappeared to Ok, never to be heard from again. Her brain currently resides in a pickle jar on Ihofe's desk, where she has been trying to quietly teach him science for the last 30 years, with little apparent succes)

Anyway, that world is now open to you, and we need to get you up to speed, so the US can climb up to 15th poition.

Here's your first lesson...

Scientific Method

A science project is an investigation using the scientific method to discover the answer to a scientific problem. Before starting your project, you need to understand the scientific method. This section uses examples to illustrate and explain the basic steps of the scientific method. The scientific method is the "tool" that scientists use to find the answers to questions. It is the process of thinking through the possible solutions to a problem and testing each possibility to find the best solution. The scientific method involves the following steps: doing research, identifying the problem, stating a hypothesis, conducting project experimentation, and reaching a conclusion.

Research
Problem
Hypothesis
Project Experimentation
Project Conclusion
Research
Research is the process of collecting information from your own experiences, knowledgeable sources, and data from exploratory experiments. Your first research is used to select a project topic. This is called topic research. For example, you observe a black growth on bread slices and wonder how it got there. Because of this experience, you decide to learn more about mold growth. Your topic will be about fungal reproduction. (Fungal refers to plant-like organisms called fungi, which cannot make their own food, and reproduction is the making of a new offspring.) CAUTION: If you are allergic to mold, this is not a topic you would investigate. Choose a topic that is safe for you to do.

After you have selected a topic, you begin what is called project research. This is research to help you understand the topic, express a problem, propose a hypothesis, and design one or more project experiments—experiments designed to test the hypothesis. An example of project research would be to place a fresh loaf of white bread in a bread box and observe the bread over a period of time as an exploratory experiment. The result of this experiment and other research give you the needed information for the next step—identifying the problem.

Do use many references from printed sources—books, journals, magazines, and newspapers—as well as electronic sources—computer software and online services.
Do gather information from professionals—instructors, librarians, and scientists, such as physicians and veterinarians.
Do perform other exploratory experiment related to your topic.
Back to Top
Problem
The problem is the scientific question to be solved. It is best expressed as an "open-ended" question, which is a question that is answered with a statement, not just a yes or a no. For example, "How does light affect the reproduction of bread mold on white bread?"

Do limit your problem. Note that the previous question is about one life process of molds—reproduction; one type of mold—bread mold; one type of bread—white bread; and one factor that affects its growth—light. To find the answer to a question such as "How does light affect molds?" would require that you test different life processes and an extensive variety of molds.
Do choose a problem that can be solved experimentally. For example, the question "What is a mold?" can be answered by finding the definition of the word mold in the dictionary. But, "At room temperature, what is the growth rate of bread mold on white bread?" is a question that can be answered by experimentation.
Back to Top
Hypothesis
A hypothesis is an idea about the solution to a problem, based on knowledge and research. While the hypothesis is a single statement, it is the key to a successful project. All of your project research is done with the goal of expressing a problem, proposing an answer to it (the hypothesis), and designing project experimentation. Then all of your project experimenting will be performed to test the hypothesis. The hypothesis should make a claim about how two factors relate. For example, in the following sample hypothesis, the two relating factors are light and bread mold growth. Here is one example of a hypothesis for the earlier problem question:

"I believe that bread mold does not need light for reproduction on white bread. I base my hypothesis on these facts:
Organisms with chlorophyll need light to survive. Molds do not have chlorophyll.
In my exploratory experiment, bread mold grew on white bread kept in a dark bread box."
Do state facts from past experiences or observations on which you base your hypothesis.
Do write down your hypothesis before beginning the project experimentation.
Don't change your hypothesis even if experimentation does not support it. If time permits, repeat or redesign the experiment to confirm your results.
Back to Top
Project Experimentation
Project experimentation is the process of testing a hypothesis. The things that have an effect on the experiment are called variables. There are three kinds of variables that you need to identify in your experiments: independent, dependent, and controlled.

The independent variable is the variable you purposely manipulate (change). The dependent variable is the variable that is being observed, which changes in response to the independent variable. The variables that are not changed are called controlled variables.

The problem in this section concerns the effect of light on the reproduction of bread mold. The independent variable for the experiment is light and the dependent variable is bread mold reproduction. A control is a test in which the independent variable is kept constant in order to measure changes in the dependent variable. In a control, all variables are identical to the experimental setup—your original setup—except for the independent variable. Factors that are identical in both the experimental setup and the control setup are the controlled variables. For example, prepare the experiment by placing three or four loaves of white bread in cardboard boxes the size of a bread box, one loaf per box. Close the boxes so that they receive no light. If, at the end of a set time period, the mold grows, you might decide that no light was needed for mold reproduction. But, before making this decision, you must determine experimentally if the mold would grow with light. Thus, control groups must be set up of bread that receives light throughout the testing period. Do this by placing an equal number of loaves in comparable-size boxes, but leave them open.

The other variables for the experimental and control setup, such as the environmental conditions for the room where the boxes are placed—temperature and humidity—and the brand of the breads used must be kept the same. These are controlled variables. Note that when designing the procedure of your project experiment, you must include steps for measuring the results. For example, to measure the amount of mold growth, you might draw 1/2-inch (1-cm) squares on a transparent sheet of plastic. This could be placed over the bread, and the number of squares with mold growth could be counted. Also, as it is best to perform the experiment more than once, it is also good to have more than one control. You might have one control for every experimental setup.

Do have only one independent variable during an experiment.
Do repeat the experiment more than once to verify your results.
Do have a control.
Do have more than one control, with each being identical.
Do organize data. (See A Sample Project for information on organizing data from experiments.)
Back to Top
Project Conclusion
The project conclusion is a summary of the results of the project experimentation and a statement of how the results relate to the hypothesis. Reasons for experimental results that are contrary to the hypothesis are included. If applicable, the conclusion can end by giving ideas for further testing.

If your results do not support your hypothesis:

Don't change your hypothesis.
Don't leave out experimental results that do not support your hypothesis.
Do give possible reasons for the difference between your hypothesis and the experimental results.
Do give ways that you can experiment further to find a solution.
If your results support your hypothesis:

You might say, for example, "As stated in my hypothesis, I believe that light is not necessary during the germination of bean seeds. My experimentation supports the idea that bean seeds will germinate without light. After seven days, the seeds tested were seen growing in full light and in no light. It is possible that some light reached the 'no light' containers that were placed in a dark closet. If I were to improve on this experiment, I would place the 'no light' containers in a light-proof box and/or wrap them in light-proof material, such as aluminum foil."
school.discoveryeducation.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (252116)12/22/2007 7:06:18 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
But B4 we start real science, we need to establish your math skills. Math is very important for science. Probably didn't take algebra, cuz that's Persian.
Did you happen to take geometry?



This is called a planet*. This one is Earth. It is where we live. Actually, more of a ball than a pi (hint). From were you are sitting to the middle of the ball is approx. 4000 miles. How big around is the ball?

There are approx. 6 billion people on it; how much of it do each of us get if the pi (hint) is equally divided?
What are the mathematical odds you will be raptured?

* This is math, not botany. There is an e in the word planet.
We will not be doing botany this year. You need chem and physics first.

Extra credit bonus question...

This is Poiseuille's law...

R = (pi*r4*(p1-p2)) / (8*n*L)
Where:
R = Rate of flow
p1 = 1st pressure
p2 = 2nd pressure
n = viscosity of fluid
L = length
r = inside radius
The viscosity of the fluid is measured in dyne sec/cm2, poise.

Why is it taught to respiratory therapists?

A. So they can talk to docs
B. So they can educate patients
C. To pass professional exams
D. To figure out the proper sized water pipes for irrigation

3) A
.1) A B
4) A C
1) A B C
5) A C D
9) All of the above
2) None of the above
65) Not enuf info to tell
(more hints)