Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HPilot who wrote (18960)	12/26/2007 10:31:23 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 36921

The first law states that energy is not created or destroyed, it also states heat cannot go from cold to hot without added energy. This is not heat transfer, non of this will not show how much heat will flow through, for example, an insulated wall VS an uninsulated wall. From this nonsense I'd guess your problem is that you don't have the foggiest idea how to understand the Laws of Thermodynamics, and since none of them are a simple equation for conduction, you somehow think that "heat transfer" is in a different branch of science. I'm sure you can't see Ohms law of electrical resistance in Maxwells equations of electromagnetism either. Does this mean that you think electrical conduction is somehow in a different branch of science from electromagnetism? That is the sort of nonsense you are pushing. It is nonsense. It is somewhat nice to consistently see that everyone bashing AGW is clueless about science. We have never had a scientifically knowledgeable poster on this board who was a denier of AGW.