SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (26985)12/28/2007 3:25:27 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217831
 
The world's monetary system is based, in large part, on trust.

Trust that a deal is a deal, trust that loans will be repaid, trust that contracts can be enforced in the event of default, trust that government confiscation of wealth will remain at a predictable level and that something of value will be given in return, such as an open and transparent legal system that protects human rights, including freedom from force and fraud. In the First World, and for the most part, in the Second World, that trust is not misplaced, or at least not entirely misplaced.

Jay is only one man, and does not speak for China as a whole.

China, US, India, Russia, EU, Brazil, Japan, and the rest of the First World and Second World are ever more tightly integrated into an economic community with relatively free exchange of ideas, relatively free flow of capital, relatively free movement of persons and things.

Jay scoffs at conducting business virtuously, but in China, the children of business owners are learning to do just that: >>Heirs of China's New Elites Schooled in Ancient Values

By Maureen Fan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, December 25, 2007; A01

CIXI, China -- In a borrowed classroom of the provincial Communist Party School, a newly busy philosophy professor addressed 15 well-groomed adult students. His message: Try to have a soul.

"In China, if you are only rich, people will not respect you. You also need good manners, an outgoing personality and good morals," said Zhang Yinghang of Zhejiang University, a professor increasingly in demand on the lecture circuit. "This is what rich children in China lack."

It was opening day of Jiaye Changqing, or "Family Enterprise Lasts Forever," a week-long course for the sons and daughters of rich entrepreneurs -- especially those sons and daughters who are about to inherit the family business. While the course included standard lessons on management strategy, it was also intended to instill traditional Chinese values in a younger generation schooled in Western, capitalist ways.

In other words, there's more to life than making money.

"The school exists partly because of the only-child syndrome, where little emperors and princes were brought up with everything within their sights. They've never shared anything with anyone else," said Luo Yu, 31, a graduate of the class in Cixi who runs his father's factory, which makes $50 million a year selling valves, pumps and gear boxes to the United States.

Once ridiculed and looked down on, entrepreneurs are now among China's elite. Along the way to wealth, however, many have neglected to show their children what they consider the proper way to behave. Now that they want to make sure their offspring are fit to take charge, courses such as Jiaye Changqing are growing popular.

Like many newly rich Chinese, the parents of the students at Jiaye Changqing have worked hard and relied on friends and relatives as business contacts. They have also ridden a wave of economic reform that over the past 20 years has transformed China.

Their children are better educated but unaccustomed to hardship. They spend money freely and return home from studying abroad with strange ideas such as networking with outsiders. Half the students in the course have studied abroad, including one woman who has jetted back and forth to China since age 7 and understood only part of Zhang's lecture.

"Entrepreneurs are leading where society is going, and if this group doesn't understand Chinese culture, it will be very bad for society," Zhang said. "People will be less and less happy, even though they have more and more money."

The founder of Jiaye Changqing, an entrepreneur himself, saw this firsthand.

In crisscrossing China to tell his own success story, Mao Lixiang frequently met tearful parents who didn't know what to do with their children. One son from Anhui province didn't want to study. A scion from a family in Zhejiang province wanted only the best clothes and the fastest cars. Other children simply weren't interested in inheriting their parents' businesses, even though most Chinese who work in the private sector do so for family-controlled companies.

"The badly behaved children don't make up a huge number, but their influence is great and it gives rich people a bad image," said Mao, 67, who began his career as an impoverished, "barefoot" teacher with a high school education. He is now board chairman of Ningbo Fotile Kitchenware, a $178 million appliance company.

Mao made his fortune selling lighters and gave his first company to his daughter. He handed off his appliance company to his son. Now his focus is the school, which he hopes to expand to teach parents and their children.

"Blood is thicker than water. Most Chinese hope their legacy will live on through their children's lives and careers. Every entrepreneur dreams this," said Chen Ling, an economics professor at Zhejiang University, which offers a training course for family-run businesses.

Luo Yu, for one, didn't share the family dream. His father started the Cixi Huili Machinery & Electric Co. here in Zhejiang with 30 people in 1988. The company now has 1,100 employees and $50 million in annual revenue.

"When I graduated from university, I had plenty of my own very good ideas. I was very farsighted," said Luo, now general manager of the company. "In 1996, I noticed Cixi didn't have a good florist shop. In 1997, no Internet cafe. In 1999, no coffee bar. All of these things had potential, but my father did not agree."

Gradually, Luo said, he saw his father's sacrifices and understood the importance of a family business. "Why should we give away what we earn through such backbreaking effort to someone else not in the family and in poverty?" the former Jiaye Changqing student said.

Meanwhile, Zhang, who seven years ago couldn't get graduate students at Zhejiang University, has achieved popularity through his lectures at Jiaye Changqing.

For the past year, he has told students that Bill Gates read ancient Chinese classics in middle school. In college, he said, Gates refused to sacrifice anymore sleep to accommodate both his company and his studies. "You should comply with the natural law. . . . Don't be so utilitarian," he said.

His students don't always agree. "I think for doing business, utilitarianism and a focus on the bottom line is good," said Ruan Shengliang, 23, who runs a shoe factory in China's southern Guangdong province. "While treating people well and giving them what they want, a businessman also needs to get back what he ought to get."

While older Chinese are trying to impart business lessons to their children, the education sometimes works the other way. Many young Chinese are teaching their parents, for instance, that casual networking with peers can be just as effective as relying on family.

Dong Ming, 26, is vice manager of his father's 400-employee metal machinery factory in nearby Chengzhou. While his father networks at the dinner table, Dong chats online or goes to karaoke bars and teahouses with about 30 friends, all children of wealthy entrepreneurs.

"My father's network is limited by his primary school education," Dong said. "It's mainly clients, government and his entrepreneur friends. Whenever he dined with officials and clients, he asked me to join him. It's important. But I should build my own network. I make friends with the media, with scholars and young people at my own age. You get new ideas from them."

That said, Dong acknowledges the importance of his father's ways and the limits of money.

"To people who already have enough money, $10 million or $100 million doesn't make a lot of difference. We can buy more luxury goods, but actually we can't consume it all. A man driving a BMW who still spits on the road, people will despise him. So money is not the most important thing," Dong said. "My father made our factory the most powerful in our township or city, but I hope to make it influential and respectable within the industry."
washingtonpost.com



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (26985)12/28/2007 3:28:24 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 217831
 
Is this going to crash because we don't go out and buy 2008 Pandas? I don't think so. >>Age of Riches - A New Breed of Billionaire
By LANDON THOMAS Jr.

ISTANBUL — Stuck in a traffic jam in his bulletproof BMW, the richest man in Turkey lets loose with a satisfied grin.

Since 2000, Husnu M. Ozyegin has spent more than $50 million of his own money, building 36 primary schools and girls’ dormitories in the poorest parts of Turkey. Next to the Turkish government, Mr. Ozyegin is the biggest individual supporter of schools in the country — and an official from the education ministry has told him that his market share is increasing.

“Not bad,” he says in his gruff, cigarette-scarred voice as he pockets his mobile phone. “If I can have an impact on one million Turkish people in the next 10 years, I will be happy.”

The global wealth boom has created a new breed of billionaire in once-destitute countries like Turkey, India, Mexico and Russia. Propelled by their rising economies, robust currencies and globally competitive companies, they have ridden a surge in local stock markets that have reached previously untouchable heights in a short five-year timeframe. Now, a number of them are using their wealth to bolster their standing and push for social changes.

These entrepreneurs, who have made their billions in private sector industries like telecommunications, petrochemicals and finance, are distinct from a past generation of international billionaires, most with ties to Middle Eastern oil or valuable land holdings. Not only have they become the richest men in their countries; they are among the wealthiest in the world.

For these emerging economies, where loose regulation, opaque privatization processes and monopolistic business practices abound, this extraordinary and uneven creation of wealth rivals in many ways the great American fortunes made at the turn of the 20th century.

While such countries have long been accustomed to vast disparities between a tiny class of the wealthy elite and the impoverished masses, the new elite shares some characteristics with counterparts in the United States. And just as Rockefellers, Carnegies and Morgans once used philanthropy to smooth the rough edges of their cutthroat business reputations — as have a current generation of wealthy Americans that includes Bill Gates of Microsoft and Sanford I. Weill of Citigroup — local billionaires in emerging markets are trying to do the same.

Global Philanthropy

Carlos Slim Helú, the telecommunications entrepreneur in Mexico who is worth more than $50 billion, has pledged billions of dollars to his two foundations that will aid health and education. Roman Abramovich, Russia’s richest man, who has a net worth of $18 billion, has channeled more than $1 billion into the impoverished Arctic area of Chukotka, where he also serves as governor, building schools and hospitals.

And in India, Azim Premji, the chairman of the software company Wipro who is worth $17 billion, has established his own foundation that supports elementary education.

To be sure, as these fortunes are still being made, the sums donated are relatively small in light of the pressing social needs of these countries. But as return-driven philanthropy has gained in popularity through the efforts of Mr. Gates and others, emerging market billionaires are applying similar bottom-line oriented lessons to their own countries.

“What we are seeing in these countries,” said Jane Wales, president of the Global Philanthropy Forum, “are people emerging from the private sector with tremendous wealth who are attracted to highly strategic philanthropy.”

A Nontraditional Climb

Here in Turkey, Mr. Ozyegin, who is 62 and has a net worth of $3.5 billion, did not secure his wealth by buying government assets on the cheap or by belonging to a rich family that controls a monopoly — two traditional routes to great wealth in the developing world.

The founder of a midtier corporate bank called Finansbank, he cashed in on a rush of interest by foreign financial institutions in Turkish banks last year and sold a controlling stake in his bank to the National Bank of Greece, receiving $2.7 billion in cash.

Flush with money and ambition, he is doing all that he can to lift Turkish educational standards at the primary and university level.

Sitting in his personal conference room atop Finansbank’s main office in Istanbul, Mr. Ozyegin recalls Aug. 18, 2006, when the sale of his 49 percent stake officially closed.

“I remember that day better than my birthday,” he said, as he leaned back in a plush leather chair. “I was not only a billionaire but the richest man in Turkey. It’s a great feeling, but your responsibilities increase.”

Like many self-made billionaires, Mr. Ozyegin has a direct, demanding manner, and a day spent traveling with him does not yield much casual conversation. He carries two cellphones, Throughout a long day he juggles calls from his wife, his assistant, his son and assorted government bureaucrats, as well as the managers of his various businesses.

He typically works 11-hour days, not solely from his suite of offices but also from his car, plane or boat, checking in on his far-flung operations in Turkey as well as Russia, Romania and China.

“I’m first generation, that gives me satisfaction,” he said. “Getting to the top is not so easy; staying there is more difficult.”

Mr. Ozyegin’s grandparents came to the southern Turkish city of Izmir from the Greek island of Crete in the late 19th century, during the dying days of the Ottoman Empire. The son of a doctor, he attended Robert College, an elite academy in Istanbul, before setting off to Oregon State University in 1963 with $1,000 in his pocket.

An overachiever, he played basketball and led the student government, but earned mediocre grades. Harvard Business School seemed like a long shot given that he was in need of a scholarship. But he attached a picture of himself welcoming Robert F. Kennedy to Oregon State to his application and was accepted. “I guess they liked me for my leadership abilities,” he said.

After a successful banking career, he founded Finansbank in 1987, selling his two homes and borrowing $3 million to get the deal done.

At the outset, the bank’s ambitions were small, providing corporate banking services to Turkish businesses. The bank’s fortunes fluctuated in line with the volatile economy, expanding rapidly during the heady years of strong economic growth, but facing extinction on two separate occasions, in 1994 and 2001, when the Turkish markets suffered contractions.

Becoming Competitive

As a businessman, his frequent interaction with Southeast Asia, China and Russia has impressed upon him the need for Turks to become more competitive in today’s global economy.

“The most important problem that Turkey has is education,” he said.

He cites the rapid increase of applications to Harvard Business School from Chinese and Indian students. Turkey, a smaller country, sends only four to eight students a year, said Mr. Ozyegin, who meets with the students when he visits.

Beyond his public school investments, Mr. Ozyegin has plans to spend up to $1 billion over the next 15 years on a new private university, to be called Ozyegin University.

“I want to do something on a major scale,” he said. “My vision is that we can train and export people like India does.”

Since he started his building program in 2000, Mr. Ozyegin has completed 36 schools and girls’ dormitories at a cost that varies from $400,000 to $1.8 million each. He wants to reach 100 by 2010. He works closely with the government, with most of the building taking place in the country’s poorest regions in the south and northeast.

“That is a lot, it is a very significant number,” said Filiz Bikmen, the executive director of Tusev, a philanthropy foundation in Istanbul.

Turkey has the lowest ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary school of any country in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which requires its 30 members to meet minimum requirements for living standards and democratic practices. Turkey’s low standing is a result of a traditional culture that, especially in poorer areas, places a higher premium on a boy’s education than a girl’s.

In a country where the ruling party draws its root support from an electorate that is becoming more Islamic in attitude and outlook, Mr. Ozyegin’s aim to reach out to undereducated girls touches a sensitive cultural vein (through his wife’s foundation, Acev, he has also helped pay for women’s literacy and early education programs in poor parts of the country.)

A practicing Muslim but avowedly secular in outlook, Mr. Ozyegin embodies the hopes as well as fears of Turkey’s elite, many of its ranks now supporters of the ruling Justice and Development party, which has led the revitalization of the Turkish economy.

Mr. Ozyegin hopes that focusing on education as an economic development tool will help transcend the current bitter disputes over religious practice, including whether the increase in the number of women wearing head scarves signifies the emergence of a more Islamic, less secular Turkey.

“I want Turkey to have the same education levels as Europe 25 years from now,” he said. “Whether you wear a scarf should not matter.”

A Focus on Education

When Mr. Ozyegin visits a school, he is frequently met by the district’s mayor, a representative from the education ministry and various other local notables. His visits, like his business meetings, are swift and to the point — a sweep through the school’s halls and a barrage of questions directed at school officials.

At a primary school bearing his name, in a working-class district on the outskirts of Istanbul, he marches into a classroom of wide-eyed sixth graders who jump to their feet with the spirit and alacrity of a platoon hailing its general and he exhorts them to heed their studies.

At another school, he upbraids an official for countenancing stained carpets and trash that lines the building’s long hallways. “This place is full of garbage,” he said, his voice low and angry. “Do something about it. It’s shameful.”

There are touching moments, too. A newly built primary school in a village close to the border with Armenia echoes with shouts of its 360 students as Mr. Ozyegin’s wife, sister and brother-in-law, who oversee the logistics of the building program, stop by for a visit.

Rarely do the children here attend high school. Many of them speak Kurdish as their first language, and their parents eke out an existence as sheep and cow herders.

Clothes are frayed and toes poke through the holes of plastic shoes. But, like the fading evening light on the snowy peak of nearby Mount Ararat, there are glimmers of hope, too.

Danyan Kuba, a tall, nervous seventh grader dressed in a coat and tie, is asked what he wants to be when he grows up. He shifts awkwardly, looks down at his shoes and back up again. “I want to be a math teacher,” he says in a strong, clear voice.

For Mr. Ozyegin, becoming one of the richest men in the world has brought its own pressures. He gets many letters each day. Some ask him to erase the debt they have on their Finansbank credit cards.

Others are more poignant — recently he received a letter from an admirer in jail asking for a pair of shoes and a suit, a request he plans to honor.

Like some who have made so much, Mr. Ozyegin likes to keep score.

Warren E. Buffett may be the richest man in the world, but Mr. Ozyegin says, his wealth has risen faster. “My compounding is better than Buffett’s, but my track record is only one-half as long,” he said.

He is also a student of the life of J. P. Morgan: he reels off how much Morgan, who dominated the world of finance at the turn of the 20th century, left to his son, daughter and wife, as well as the salary he awarded the captain of his yacht. But Mr. Ozyegin’s lack of renown on the larger global stage nags at him.

“I’m giving away 2 percent of my net income every month,” he said. “I don’t think Bill Gates is doing that.”
nytimes.com



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (26985)12/28/2007 6:41:26 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217831
 
what apparent conflict?
to advocate prevention of war on the one hand and suggest that all borders should be down and out on the other?
you see a conflict? how so?
obviously, without borders and visa requirements, all tibetans can move to nz for all i care. can you not think out the obvious, or are you so much of the dimension of a whale that you see conflict where none exist?

cb advocates trust in happenings and entities deserving none, consistently wrong to the point of 100% bang-on profit resulting if and only if using her as contrary indicator, and she does so out of either mal intent or ignorance, she can choose, and so prime evil, so simple.

i advocate the tried and true, trust in gold, and so as to achieve sovereign status, to be free, per maestro greensputin before he turned prime evil 321gold.com

chugs, tj

p.s. another gudd day has gone by, lovely and so gudd-la