Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William Hunt who wrote (72806)	12/31/2007 8:11:20 PM
From: JeffreyHF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 196845

Of course they will talk Emergency Stay and Appeal. The tainted verdict shouldn't have been allowed to stand after the "wilful infringement" instruction was found to be erroneous.The prejudice was obvious, and a New Trial should have been granted. Also, there is a major issue of irreparable harm, given the paralytic inability to advertise, seek new business, etc., and the more stringent test for granting injunctions. Another PR coup goes to Broadcom, who has no 3G IPR of note, and who has no intention of commercially resolving this mess. They are out to decimate Qualcomm, and appear well on their way to that objective.Unfortunately for them, with Qualcomm's vastly superior cellular IPR, Broadcom is committing mobile suicide in the process.