SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (72847)1/1/2008 9:28:46 AM
From: JeffreyHF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196660
 
Slacker, how would splitting the company play into the anti "patent troll"bent of evolving case law and statutory reform, as well as the "practicing the art" requirement? The silence from HQ is most unusual and disturbing. You can bet the big guns are flocking home from Aspen and the islands to decide how tactical their atomic response must be. This raises the level of anxiety, and the requirement for previously unimagined action, to the highest level.



To: slacker711 who wrote (72847)1/1/2008 7:10:44 PM
From: engineer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 196660
 
yes, they should not split teh company. You come on here with nothing but complaints. Day after day. Gets old.



To: slacker711 who wrote (72847)1/2/2008 4:51:25 AM
From: Raglanroadie  Respond to of 196660
 
No and never. Our competitors want to break our synergy so why should we split and become less influencial? This is not the path to high position IMO and I might add management since they have so far chosen to stay together.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News