Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (27305)	1/4/2008 12:53:42 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217917

There are naked Aztecs leaping around clutching their little gold totems, chanting imprecations to the deities for the Emperor to topple. Atavistic barbarians everywhere! Cargo cult everywhere, with clueless government kleptocrats lining their and their supporters pockets. One of your best bits of prose, and there are many. But I think I see an apostrophe violation.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (27305)	1/4/2008 5:16:34 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217917

osake, mosake, osake mosake, ohmmmmmmmmmn finance.yahoo.com i am tempted to sell paper gold and lock-in the goodness, although i promised self not to do it again until the big penultimate liquidation selling gold is like having sex, difficult to stop given that i am tempted to sell, probably means i should consider buying more another good feature of gold, like sex, one can spend a lot of time thinking about it, even though it is simplicity itself requiring no thought i suppose, by past experience, one should just buy more when feel like selling, and sell all when figuring to buy more this above rumination is also why the best gold is physical gold, for it is troublesome to sell given its mass, and whenever one sees the physical, one actually change mind about selling even the paper gold, and turns a buyer like sex, when confronted with a choice, the decision invariably points to more is better than less, now better than later, for self better than for others, and that it is good, requiring no debate, just like money, except much more permanent and robusto how simple is that?