SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)1/11/2008 12:22:47 PM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362902
 
What is their stock symbol?



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)1/11/2008 1:12:33 PM
From: altair19  Read Replies (8) | Respond to of 362902
 
Sea Otter

<No problem, Rat. Countrywide's Mozillo to get a $115M exit bonus.>

Doesn't seem like that big a deal...$115 million for architecting predatory lending and almost bringing down the stock market and creating the front edge of the upcoming recession. Maybe $100 million would have been more appropriate for a separation package given the circumstances.

Yeesh.

Altair19



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)3/28/2008 12:12:06 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362902
 
EBay's early backer to leave board of directors
_______________________________________________________________

Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:58pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - EBay Inc said on Thursday that early venture capital backer and long-time board member Robert Kagle plans to stand down as a director of the company at its next annual shareholder meeting.

Kagle made one of his earliest investments in eBay of between $5 million and $7 million as a partner with Silicon Valley venture capital firm Benchmark Capital in eBay.

The value of this investment multiplied many times over during the dot-com era and was worth upward of $5 billion at its peak -- and is believed to be one of the most lucrative VC investments ever made, according to reports at the time.

He notified the company on Tuesday that he would not stand for reelection at the stockholders meeting in June, but will continue to serve as a director until the meeting.

The company said in a U.S. regulatory filing that Kagle was leaving solely for personal reasons and time considerations and did not involve any disagreement with the company, the company's management or the board of directors.

He sits on the board of a variety of Silicon Valley start-ups, including Mint.com and Prosper. Kagle did not immediately reply to e-mail requesting comment.

In addition, eBay named Phillip DePaul as a vice president and its chief accounting officer, effective April 14.

DePaul previously worked at OfficeMax Inc (OMX.N: Quote, Profile, Research), where he worked as senior vice president, controller and chief accounting officer since 2003. He also employed in the audit practice of Ernst & Young LLP from 1993 to 1998.

DePaul will receive an annual salary of $350,000 and be given the option of buying 49,000 shares of eBay common stock and 24,500 restricted stock units.

He will also receive one-time bonuses totaling $135,000, and be eligible for relocation assistance and expenses for moving from Chicago to Silicon Valley.



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)5/21/2008 12:10:57 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362902
 
The Real VCs Of Silicon Valley

forbes.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)11/5/2008 5:08:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362902
 
Cisco First-Quarter Sales Growth Slowest in 3 Years (Update1)

By Vivek Shankar

Nov. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Cisco Systems Inc., the world's largest maker of networking equipment, said first-quarter sales rose at the slowest pace in three years as the slumping economy crimped customers' budgets.

Net income was little changed at $2.2 billion, or 37 cents a share, compared with $2.21 billion, or 35 cents, a year earlier, Cisco said today in a statement.

Revenue in the period ended Oct. 25 climbed 8.1 percent to $10.3 billion, meeting analysts' estimates, as customers clamped down because of the credit crisis. Chief Executive Officer John Chambers has said his clients expect the economy to rebound early next year. He may change that prediction on a conference call today.

``The overall tone of business especially in October was so poor,'' Chuck Heath, an analyst at UMB Investment Advisors in Kansas City, Missouri, said before the report. UMB owns about 760,000 Cisco shares among $11 billion under management. ``They are clearly seeing that business is deteriorating in the current environment,'' said Heath, who recommends buying Cisco shares.

Investors view Cisco as a technology industry barometer because it dominates the market for routers and switches, which direct and control the flow of data over networks.

Cisco, based in San Jose, California, fell 2.4 percent in extended trading to $16.97 after falling 94 cents, or 5.1 percent, to $17.39 at 4 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The shares have declined 36 percent this year.

Excluding stock-based compensation, profit was 42 cents a share, compared with the 39-cent average of estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

Credit Crunch Effect

The company bought back 46 million shares in the quarter for about $1 billion. That helped boost net earnings per share by reducing the number of outstanding shares to 5.97 billion from 6.33 billion a year earlier.

The U.S. economy probably will contract for a second- straight period in the fourth quarter, according to economists in a Bloomberg survey.

The financial crisis may shave as much as 2 percent off Cisco's revenue because customers, primarily in emerging markets, won't be able to get credit, according to Ehud Gelblum, an analyst with JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York.

Cisco got about 11 percent of 2008 revenue from emerging markets, excluding China and India.

Gelblum, who rates Cisco ``neutral,'' is the top-rated telecommunications equipment analyst by Institutional Investor magazine. He estimates revenue growth in the current quarter of 1.8 percent to about $10 billion. Analysts in the Bloomberg survey project a 7.4 percent gain to $10.6 billion.

Cisco first warned of a slowdown about a year ago. Chambers said at the time he saw a ``dramatic'' drop in orders from customers in the automobile and financial industries.

Still, the company hasn't changed an August 2007 projection that calls for 12 percent to 17 percent annual sales growth for the next three to five years. Analysts project revenue in fiscal 2009, which ends in July, to increase 7.6 percent, according to the Bloomberg survey.

``It's going to come in well below their long-term growth rate,'' UMB's Heath said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Vivek Shankar in San Francisco at vshankar3@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 5, 2008 16:45 EST



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)11/7/2008 8:23:48 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362902
 
The Cash Panic Sweeping The VC Industry

alleyinsider.com

By Henry Blodget

November 7, 2008 11:55 AM

Why have VC firms and PE firms clamped down on investments so fast? Why are they shouting from the rooftops that portfolio companies had better start cutting costs immediately?

Well, for one thing, because they're not boneheads. This economy has the potential to become the worst economy since the Great Depression (it isn't yet, thankfully). VCs see this and understand that:

-- Profitable exits are going to be a lot rarer in the next couple of years, and

-- Potential investments--including current portfolio companies--are going to get a lot cheaper in the next few years (and, therefore, returns on future investments are going to get a lot higher than today's) .

That logic alone explains why money has gotten so tight so fast. But VC sources say there's also another important dynamic going on: The folks who supply the money that VCs invest--Limited Partners such as pension funds and endowments--are now strapped for cash because the values of their own portfolios have plummeted (and so many of the investments are illiquid). Some are reportedly beginning to default on or defer commitments. In VC-land, in other words, as elsewhere, the oxygen is being sucked out of the room.

Here are some notes from SAI conversations with two VC sources this morning:

There are now unbelievable difficulties in the LP world. Many of the best names are having liquidity problems. They are having trouble meeting capital calls from Private Equity and VC firms and need to sell stocks to get cash. Much of their stock portfolios are tied up in hedge funds with lockups, however, so they can't liquidate those positions.

Some Limited Partners are starting to default on their commitments to VC firms [this is scuttlebutt, not firsthand knowledge; the sources' firms have not seen defaults]. In some cases this can mean they lose their investment to date, but since the LPs think the the VC funds are going to be losers anyway it does not matter. Some second-tier VC funds are reportedly looking at the fine print to see if they can sue the LPs who don't follow through on their commitments.

[In case you don't know how VC funding works: When a VC "raises" a $100 million fund, what the firm really has done is gotten commitments from LPs that they will deliver $100 million over the life of the fund. The firm then issues "capital calls" over the next few years and gradually draws the money down. It is these calls that some LPs are reportedly starting to default on.]

The most agressive LPs have been hurt the most. For example, a rumor is circulating that Columbia's endowment fund is illiquid [can't raise the cash it needs to fund current commitments]. Harvard is trying to sell 1/3 of its private equity portfolio at a steep discount in a secondary offering. You would only do this today if you are really in deep doo doo.* [Private Equity Online is reporting this--see below]

The market price for LP positions in VC funds on average is 75 cents on the dollar. Limited partnership positions in PE funds are selling for 50-60 cents on the dollar. This suggests that $50-$100 billion in value has gone in the past few months from PE funds alone.

The major university endowments are reportedly down 25-30% on a mark-to-market basis [sounds extreme, but certainly possible]. Big universities are heavily in commodities, PE, VC hedge funds, and very little in bonds. They are getting killed across the board

Pension funds are a little bit less aggressive but they also may be more exposed soon.

We have only spoken to a couple of VCs about this, and we assume many firms are not affected. We have heard the endowment scuttlebutt before, though (Princeton was a name that came up a few weeks ago), and it makes sense: University endowments need to fund massive cash spending every year, but they also don't like to compromise annual returns by keeping much of the portfolio in cash. So now that the value of ALL assets has plummeted and so many endowment investments are subject to lock-ups, it certainly sounds plausible that the funds are having trouble raising necessary cash.

Any VCs or LPs care to weigh in? We'd love to hear from you. All sources obviously kept confidential. hblodget@alleyinsider.com.



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)11/24/2008 5:24:58 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362902
 
Hewlett-Packard Reports 10% Jump in Computer Sales (Update2)

By Connie Guglielmo

Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Hewlett-Packard Co., the world’s biggest personal-computer maker, reported a 10 percent increase in PC sales last quarter, beating some estimates, as demand for laptops held up in the face of a slowing economy.

PC revenue climbed to $11.2 billion, the Palo Alto, California-based company said today in a statement. Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in New York, projected that PC sales would rise to $11 billion.

Hewlett-Packard spurred sales by redesigning its best- selling notebooks and going after budget-minded shoppers with a new line of mini-portables priced below $400. The company relied on its network of more than 80,000 retailers to maintain its two- year lead over Dell Inc. in the worldwide PC market.

“The PC business is actually better than I’d expected,” said Chuck Jones, an analyst in San Francisco with Atlantic Trust Private Wealth Management, which controls $16 billion in assets, including Hewlett-Packard shares. “That’s a good number, especially compared to Dell.”

Hewlett-Packard was little changed in late trading after rising 3.1 percent to $35.70 on the New York Stock Exchange. The shares have lost 29 percent this year.

Fourth-quarter net income dropped 2.4 percent to $2.11 billion, or 84 cents a share, from $2.16 billion, or 81 cents, a year earlier, the company said. Excluding some costs, profit was $1.03 a share. Today’s results, which cover the quarter ended Oct. 31, followed preliminary numbers released last week.

Market Lead

“It will be a challenging environment and we’re planning on such,” Chief Executive Officer Mark Hurd said today on a conference call with reporters. “We can only control the things we can control, which is our cost structure and the competitiveness of our products.”

The company accounted for 18 percent of PC shipments in the most recent quarter, according to Gartner Inc. Dell had 14 percent, the Stamford, Connecticut-based research firm said.

PC shipments represent almost a third of revenue at Hewlett- Packard and about 17 percent of operating profit. Sales of notebooks rose 21 percent, while revenue from desktop systems dropped 2 percent. Profit from the PC group rose 4.6 percent to $616 million. The margin, or the percentage of sales left after deducting product costs, narrowed to 5.5 percent, from 5.8 percent a year earlier.

Printer Sales

Hewlett-Packard, which also leads the market for printers, said sales in that business dropped less than 1 percent to $7.5 billion. The unit’s profit rose to $1.16 billion, from $1.1 billion a year earlier. Sales of printing supplies grew 9 percent.

Since taking over in 2005, Hurd has eliminated jobs, closed offices and merged data centers to lift profit even as he expands through acquisitions. The company last week forecast a rise in 2009 profit to as much as $4.03 a share, higher than the $3.89 anticipated by analysts in a Bloomberg survey. Investors took that as a sign the company is prepared to squeeze more out of sales as customers reduce spending amid a worldwide recession.

Sales, boosted by the acquisition of Electronic Data Systems Corp. in August, rose 19 percent to $33.6 billion. Without EDS, sales gained 5 percent, the company said last week.

Profit this quarter will be 93 cents to 95 cents a share on first-quarter sales of $32 billion to $32.5 billion, the company said. For the fiscal year ending in October 2009, Hewlett-Packard expects sales of $127.5 billion to $130 billion.

Safe Forecast?

“I don’t think the company would give out a number they would miss,” said Bill Kreher, an analyst at Edward Jones in St. Louis. He advises buying the shares, which he doesn’t own personally. “Mark Hurd is known for giving conservative forecasts, and he usually beats his numbers.”

Corporate technology spending will grow at less than half the pace initially predicted next year as financial clients pare orders, research firm IDC said this month.

Global technology spending probably will rise 2.6 percent in 2009, down from an earlier estimate of 5.9 percent, according to Framingham, Massachusetts-based IDC. Growth in the U.S. will slow to 0.9 percent, the research firm estimated.

Hurd spent $13.2 billion on EDS to expand Hewlett-Packard’s services business. In September, he said he would cut 24,600 jobs, or 7.5 percent of the combined workforce, to save $1.8 billion a year. It was his biggest workforce reduction.

Services revenue almost doubled to $8.64 billion, boosted by the EDS acquisition.

To contact the reporter on this story: Connie Guglielmo in San Francisco at cguglielmo@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 24, 2008 17:06 EST



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)12/2/2008 12:59:46 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362902
 
Obama Names Innovation Team

eweek.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)12/4/2008 1:22:16 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362902
 
Cisco Is ‘Very Comfortable’ With Long-Term Forecast (Update2)

By Vivek Shankar

Dec. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Cisco Systems Inc. Chief Executive Officer John Chambers said he is “very comfortable” with the company’s long-term forecast of 12 percent to 17 percent annual sales growth in a normal economy.

“The odds of us achieving this are pretty good,” Chambers, 59, said today at a Credit Suisse AG conference in Scottsdale, Arizona. He didn’t explain what he means by a normal economy.

Cisco, the world’s biggest networking-gear maker, will benefit as consumers download more movies and companies use videoconferencing to reduce business travel, Chambers said. Last month, Cisco forecast its first quarterly sales drop in five years as customers curbed orders to cope with the economic slump.

Companies are holding back spending because they don’t know when the slowdown will end, Chambers said today. During the recession, Cisco plans to be “extremely aggressive” in building new businesses and buying smaller companies, he said, adding there are no plans to cut jobs.

Cisco, based in San Jose, California, rose 69 cents, or 4.5 percent, to $16.01 at 4 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The shares have fallen 41 percent this year.

Fiscal second-quarter sales will drop as much as 10 percent to about $8.85 billion, the company said last month.

To contact the reporter on this story: Vivek Shankar in San Francisco at vshankar3@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: December 3, 2008 16:06 EST



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)12/9/2008 12:24:23 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362902
 
VC Ackerman: Firms That Didn’t Syndicate Are SOL
_______________________________________________________________

By Connie Loizos
PeHub
December 9th, 2008

Last Friday, I caught up with Bob Ackerman, who co-founded early-stage venture firm Allegis Capital back in 1995.

Allegis is a low-flying operation that has enjoyed a few exits in recent years, including IronPort Systems, which raised $94 million and sold to Cisco for $830 million, and the telephony software company Ribbit, which raised $23 million before selling to British Telecom in July for $105 million.

Ackerman himself is no shrinking violet, however, and he’s certainly not shy when discussing his views on the industry. Here’s part of our conversation:

You position yourself as a “value investor.” Are you in the middle of a shopping binge?

We’ll seize on depressed valuations, definitely. What’s interesting this time around is how quickly valuations have fallen. Between 2001 and 2002, it took five quarters for it to happen. There was this rolling denial that worked its way through the venture community. This time it has happened in six weeks.

Where have valuations taken the biggest hit?

This time, the Series Bs and Cs have collapsed. Basically, innovation is on sale. I mean, if there’s no apparent difference in valuation or a minimal difference [between a Series A and Series B deal], why not take advantage of company that’s farther down the road and got there using someone else’s money? The risk is that fewer raw startups get funded, but those that do are of very high quality.

You used the word “collapse.” What does that mean exactly? Ron Conway said last week that Series A valuations have dropped by roughly 25 percent. Is that what you’re seeing, too?

I’d say it’s even a bigger drop than that. Depending on the situation, you’re seeing pre-money valuations come down from 25 percent to 50 percent [for Series A deals]. Then Bs and Cs have collapsed entirely because the capital in the pipeline isn’t moving.

Yikes. So what’s fueling the breakdown of these rounds? Valuations that were grossly overinflated? Skittish LPs?

Both, but also frankly a lot of VCs are going out business — I’d say 25 percent of them will disappear.

Meanwhile, some others don’t like to syndicate. They’ve raised these big funds, they’ve been greedy, and they’ve been under pressure to deploy the money on a three-year schedule, writing bigger and bigger checks. The problem is that the music has stopped, and now those firms have to be prepared to provide all of a company’s capital. Many of them are asking: how do I manage this? Their cash reserves are under pressure. All of it has people panicking.

You’ve said before that you help build companies to be acquired. You’ve given up entirely on the IPO market?

What’s very clear is that I have no idea what the public market will look like five or six or seven years from now. So what does that mean? It means don’t assume an IPO exit. If you’re creating value, there should be a corporate buyer for that value.



To: Sea Otter who wrote (123912)12/9/2008 1:39:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362902
 
Kosmix, a Silicon Valley search startup backed by Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, has reportedly raised another $20 million from Time Warner, Accel Partners, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Dag Ventures and others. The company is led by by Anand Rajaraman and Venky Harinarayan, who the Guardian notes previously sold their company, Junglee, to Amazon.com for $250 million. kosmix.com