SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dybdahl who wrote (3438)1/20/2008 10:24:19 AM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71456
 
>>> I think it's obvious that this trade deficit is a security problem.<<,

I'm checking my Made-in-China shoes for imbedded listening devices.



To: dybdahl who wrote (3438)1/20/2008 1:29:06 PM
From: the navigator  Respond to of 71456
 
Guys, I've got a question for you: USA usually defends its vital interests: WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Kuwait, Iraq... why didn't USA defend itself from the trade deficit to China? I think it's obvious that this trade deficit is a security problem.

That's a good question. In the past, I might've speculated on mass hysteria and the ability of humans to only believe what they want to believe, etc.

However, after living through the past 7 years with my eyes open I would now just shake my head and say that anything is possible, including an engineered attempt to integrate this country into a New World Order by TPTB.



To: dybdahl who wrote (3438)1/20/2008 7:29:19 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 71456
 
>>> I think it's obvious that this trade deficit is a security problem.<<,

For whom, one might ask:
under normal circumstances it is a security risk for the lender not the borrower. In that case, China who finances the deficit on a continued basis has the problem (others too).