Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ACII - AmeriChip International, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BarclayDonaldson who wrote (949)	1/21/2008 4:53:47 PM
From: rushlong	Respond to of 2396

Excellent posts Barclay, You have backed up your statements with irrefutable facts. Although the problem is some people don't want to be confused or bothered by the facts. Some people also aren't capable of critical and unbias (as much as possible) thinking. In short they have difficulty clearly understanding the difference between "facts" and opinions" and don't even know it. If we can't agree on some basic truths then a constructive discussion regarding our investment in Americhip is not possible. There has to be at least some common ground as a starting point to work from or with. If not, its sort of like talking to each other in different languages and neither is totally aware that that is happening. Again, this assumes the participants are trying to both understand and communicate in an open and honest way without ulterior motives and deception.

To: BarclayDonaldson who wrote (949)	1/21/2008 6:33:02 PM
From: Ted M	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2396

Thanks Barclay. Dilution is never good for shareholders, for sure. The debt schedule actually doesn't look too bad, so it really does primary come down to the LACC, for me. Would longtime shareholders agree that they have been fairly secretive about the onging status of LACC? If so, I guess I don't really understand why---what do they have to lose if they talk about their testing status, high volume results, and actual LACC revenue in more detail in the 10K, 10Q, or at least in some PR's? Wouldn't such discussion increase shareholder support? tedm