Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ACII - AmeriChip International, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ted M who wrote (951)	1/22/2008 1:12:53 AM
From: rushlong	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2396

Barclay, do you think americhip's stocks terrible performance in 2007 was a surprise to management. As you know, they agreed to pay KSI's owner the money owed for buying it quicker if their stock meet certain levels. The 10KSB/A report filed March 12, 07 mentions the details of this on page 28. It lists prices of .30, .40 and .50. These are pre-split numbers. I wondering if Americhip thought they could reach these levels in 2007 or perhaps KSI's owner did and insisted on these terms. I hope one or both of these were true because the only other reason to put this in writing would be for investor's benifit ie. making it look like this was a good possibility. Americhip's management has said repeatedly that the Rossmann fiasco really messed up things and set them back a number of months its possible that has been the main problem. Its too bad we will probablly never know what Rossmann did. You would think we should have the right to know because if he screwed americhip he screwed it's investors as well.

To: Ted M who wrote (951)	1/23/2008 11:26:39 AM
From: boundtb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2396

TedM: Secretive vs Proposed Shareholder Meeting. On your question about "...would long time shareholders agree that they (ACII) have been fairly secretive about ongoing status of LACC?" I am not a long timer although I am recently invested, I have watched over past 14 months. From MHO of what I see, I would say, not really, and not any intentions to do so beyond typical protocol. I frame this opinion by recent overtures via Windsor expressing a shareholder meeting. I have heard ACII is discussing a shareholder meeting, for this year, and that it would be a first! Have I heard correctly? There are many questions out here and some, if not most, seem pessimistic. As you may have noticed this is a view I do not share. In any event I think the effort to put on a shareholder meeting is a very bullish direction on this point. Any progress to make it happen hopefully will dispel the questions & pessimism. I take it as a positive sign showing ACII not to be secretive but more open & I would agree with you that this would increase shareholder support if not great platform to promote this company. I guess I am asking for a vote in favor of a shareholder meeting. I have not seen a battle cry for this since it was mentioned - if true - if not, I would like to get it going. So who all wants a shareholder meeting and when? Sincerely boundtb

To: Ted M who wrote (951)	1/23/2008 3:20:42 PM
From: rushlong	Respond to of 2396

Ted, Marc has repeatedly said that the large companies Americhip is working with are not allowing him to discuss what they are working on in anyway. This is why he says he can't give us any information. I personally believe him but that is largely based on faith not proof so far. Its often very hard to independently verify information penny stock companies put out. For example there is no way for any of us to get verification from Ford, GM, the Defense dept. etc that they are working with Americhip. The Lacc process is real, Americhip is real but what has transpired between them and these huge companies we don't know yet.