SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (47493)1/31/2008 3:11:29 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541967
 
I might have put up with it knowing that the "solution" was worse.

Perhaps we just haven't finished the process yet. It's been a pretty short cycle, after all, and it's been dramatic. There are still kinks to be worked out and kinks take time.

I don't like the number of female headed households in poverty.

Me, neither, but female headed households in poverty being caused by women having to work? Or by women having the option to work? Huh?



To: epicure who wrote (47493)1/31/2008 3:46:10 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 541967
 
I'm not sure that they have to work more than they did in the past. Maybe to meat today's lifestyle expectations they do, but today's lifestyle expectations are a lot higher than in the past.

Well with more single Mom's you do have a group that has more need to work than in the past, so you have something of a point, but I'm not sure that women married to men with full time employment really need to work more, they just expect more, and can't get it unless they also work.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News