Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (20515)	2/19/2008 2:26:34 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36921

You have conflated a few issues: 1) AGW does not in itself say anything about warming till humans have major problems. 2) It does not saying anything about massive costs to fix anything. What it does say is that the globe is warming primarily due to human causes. I think the evidence is very solid that the global is warming due to human causes. That is what all the science is about. I think the evidence is reasonable that we will see sufficient warming to cause significant human problems. Again, this is based on the science, but is less clear since it departs from the known and calibrated range of the models. I think the evidence that massive restructuring of the world economy is needed to address the issue is very poor.