SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (29904)2/25/2008 5:34:18 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217884
 
Mauritius would be my first pick I think. We have family from Mauritius... They speak French and are in Quebec.. they are ethnic Chinese but really consider themselves as ex Mauritians :o)

History is rife with examples where conquering invaders were assimilated ... Then there is the interesting case of Iceland where the DNA is overwhelmingly from Irish slaves... The only solution is to get your birth rate up ..

I think Rudd is a fluent Mandarin speaker :O)

Tian Min .. LOL



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (29904)2/25/2008 6:19:20 PM
From: Sea Otter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217884
 
My suggestion was in jest, of course. Anyway: you would hate Houston.

As to demographic trends, Maurice, you could always try mixing your DNA. It works in my family.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (29904)2/25/2008 6:55:59 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217884
 
hello maurice, back to drama watching.

look, macro economic illiteracy at work - wonder if cb ilaine approves or not

from e-mail in-tray

good grief! some of this stuff is positively hair-raising nonsense. we already know from the HH testimonies that Congress is largely populated by economic illiterates, but even so this collection of ideas is breath-taking in its stupidity.

meanwhile, S&P has today 'affirmed' the AAA rating of MBI and ABK! who says there's no comedy in high finance? your bonds may trade at a 20% yield, but S&P knows better!
this strikes me as quite a gamble on their part actually...or maybe they were leaned on?

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Ramsey wrote:

news.yahoo.com

more great ideas




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (29904)2/25/2008 6:59:31 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217884
 
look again, at systemic fraud at work, by poor disadvantaged know-nothing buyers and sellers guilty only of believing predatory lenders

the only winner is a dead man who sat through all the drama, according to the chicago trib

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-sun_fraud_0224feb24,0,7175887,print.story

This house was a steal
TRIBUNE INVESTIGATION: How fraud led to this property changing hands 3 times as son of owner sat dead inside
By Susan Chandler, TRIBUNE REPORTER Tribune reporter David Jackson contributed to this report

February 24, 2008

The new buyers of a rundown graystone on the South Side showed up Jan. 9 to look at the house they won at a foreclosure auction. They took the plywood off the front door and went inside to make sure the utilities had been shut off. Then they called the police.

Sitting upright in the corner of a bedroom off the kitchen was a human skeleton in a red tracksuit. Next to him lay a dead dog. Neighbors told police the corpse was almost certainly Randy Johnson, a middle-age man who lived alone in the North Kenwood house.

The cause of Johnson's death has not yet been determined, but it is just one of the mysteries about 4578 S. Oakenwald Ave. Somehow, Johnson's house was transferred three times to new owners without anyone noticing he was inside. It's a story involving forged deeds, a corrupt title company and a South Side family that has been under investigation for mortgage fraud.

Left holding the bag is Countrywide Home Loans, the nation's largest mortgage lender and a company whose practices are being scrutinized by the Illinois attorney general's office. Countrywide made mortgages of $450,000 on the property. Now it is likely to lose it all because it financed the sale of a home whose rightful owner was in no condition to sell.

The intrigue surrounding the Oakenwald house offers a glimpse into the strange and murky world of mortgage fraud. Lenders duped into making loans have every incentive to unload the properties, and almost none to blow the whistle on wrongdoers. If borrowers or government watchdogs fail to cry foul, the same home can change hands again and again before anyone is the wiser.

"They foreclose. They don't care. They just foreclose," said Daniel Lindsey, a supervisory attorney with the Legal Assistance Foundation of Metropolitan Chicago. Most of the time, he said, the foreclosures go through because no one with an interest has the legal firepower to stop them.

As lenders prepare to move an unprecedented number of troubled properties off their books, it's buyer beware with a vengeance. Illinois Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan has called it a looming crisis.

Lenders filed 91,000 foreclosures in Illinois last year, a number expected to go higher in 2008. If fraud was involved in only a small percentage of those loans, it still translates into thousands of homes with troubled histories that could come back to haunt lenders, owners and entire neighborhoods.

Last week, Countrywide vacated the recent sale of 4578 S. Oakenwald and returned the buyer's money. That happened only after Cook County officials announced they would fight to put the house back in the Johnson family's name.

Known in neighborhood

All the longtime neighbors at the south end of Oakenwald Avenue knew Randy Johnson and his mother, Arrellia Johnson.

Randy Johnson had never been quite normal, they said. He was standoffish, almost aloof as a child. They said he didn't work except for tinkering with cars in front of his house, and as he got older he became reclusive.

There were "Keep Out" and "Private Property" signs posted all over his small back yard, which was crowded with six city garbage cans. A metal shopping cart blocked the concrete stairs to the basement door, and a collection of jury-rigged chains and padlocks held outside doors shut.

Oakenwald neighbor Craig Cox remembers that it took years for Johnson to respond to him when he waved. Scott Clayton, whose garage faced Johnson's across the alley, recalled a few run-ins with him.

One time Johnson complained when Clayton was clearing snow from his garage door and piling it next to a brick wall that served as Johnson's back fence. Clayton didn't understand why until later, when he saw Johnson climbing over the brick wall because his gate was broken.

Whatever his quirks, Johnson was a neighborhood fixture, sitting on his front stoop in a butterfly chair with his dog, Prince, beside him. He loved animals and adopted strays.

Things got worse for Johnson, neighbors say, after his family began to fall apart. One sister, Joe Ann Harris, died in 1996. Another sister, Bobbiette, moved to the East Coast.

Then his mother died in 2001, and Johnson was left alone in the three-story house.

In November 2005, Johnson was arrested for brandishing a "short sword" when a female friend wanted to go home, police records show. He didn't stop her, but police charged him with aggravated assault. He posted bond and was ordered to return for a court date in early December 2005. Johnson never showed up, records show, and his bond was forfeited.

When Johnson hadn't appeared outside for weeks in early 2006, neighbors called the city's non-emergency number asking for well-being checks, fearing he might have had an accident. Firefighters broke down the front door and searched but didn't locate Johnson. His death remains under investigation.

Red flags missed

Someone without Johnson's best interest at heart also noticed his absence.

In October 2006, a deed was filed with the Cook County recorder of deeds indicating Johnson's mother, Arrellia Johnson, had transferred the house to a woman named Rhonda Evans.

The deed appeared to have been drawn up 10 years earlier, in 1996, when Arrellia Johnson was still alive, which should have been a red flag that something unusual was going on, real estate attorneys say. The deed bears the signature and notary seal of Mae Evans, who is Rhonda Evans' mother, Missouri birth records show.

Mae Evans also is the mother of Edwin Evans, a convicted rapist and armed robber, who was indicted on mortgage fraud in September. (See accompanying story.)

The deed is a "forgery and fraudulent," according to a motion filed in Chancery Court by Cook County Public Administrator Michael Bender. Bender's office represents the estates of people who die without wills in Cook County.

To back up the forgery claim, Bender noted that the purported 1996 deed was drawn up on the stationery of Cook County Recorder Eugene Moore, which is not possible because Moore did not take office until 1999. Jesse White was recorder of deeds in 1996.

Phony 'straw buyer'

That discrepancy did not stop the warranty deed from being recorded. Rhonda Evans then sold the house to Donald Franklin of Harvey for $450,000 in late January 2007, documents show.

On the same day, Franklin took out a $360,000 first mortgage and a $90,000 second mortgage from Countrywide -- 100 percent financing.

Franklin was a "fraudulent straw buyer," who was working with the Evanses, according to Bender's motion. The title company that handled the closing, TriStar Title, has had its Illinois license revoked and is under investigation for mortgage fraud in Missouri and Illinois. The company has gone out of business.

Franklin never moved into the house. The next month, he stopped making mortgage payments. Countrywide filed a motion to foreclose on the property May 29, documents in the case show. Tribune efforts to locate Franklin were unsuccessful.

Then Countrywide's attorneys asked the judge to speed things up because the house appeared to not be lived in, a special status under Illinois law known as "non-residential," documents show. Judge Carolyn Quinn granted the motion, a decision that cut a month off the usual seven-month period an owner would have had to reclaim the property.

In January, Countrywide held an auction for 4578 S. Oakenwald and accepted a bid of $93,000. It was more than a 75 percent discount from the original mortgage debt and one-third what a nearby vacant house sold for a few months earlier.

Still, the sale needed a judge's final approval, which usually comes about six weeks after an auction. Before that happened, the Cook County public administrator stepped into the case, and Countrywide decided to walk away from the sale.

Countrywide, which is based in Calabasas, Calif., declined repeated requests for comment.

The public administrator's office has said it will open an estate in the name of Arrellia Johnson, the last person who held legitimate title to the house, and already is searching for her heirs. Ultimately, the house will be sold and the proceeds split among those who are legally entitled to a share.

A lengthy process

Chicago attorney Arthur Rosenson knows how hard it is to unravel a fraudulent mortgage transaction.

For a year now, he has been fighting to undo another back-dated deed with Rhonda Evans' name on it that was filed in October 2006, the same month the Johnson house was transferred.

Rosenson's client is Mary Fredericks, an elderly Chicago woman who moved into assisted living, leaving her longtime home at 9220 S. Union Ave. unoccupied. Her niece noticed something wrong when she checked on Fredericks' house and saw someone had changed the locks with her aunt's belongings still inside.

The niece called the Chicago Bar Association for help, and the group referred her to Rosenson, who is working on the case for a reduced fee.

Rosenson quickly figured out that Fredericks had never met Evans, and he asked Chancery Court Judge Peter Flynn to declare Fredericks' signature on the deed a forgery. The judge did so in November.

Buyer called a victim

But the attorney is still trying to get title to the house back in his client's name. The case is complicated by the fact that two months after the deed to Evans was recorded, Evans transferred title to Ricky Walker of Chicago.

Walker then took out a $123,000 mortgage from BNC Mortgage, the subprime-lending arm of investment house Lehman Brothers. Lehman shuttered BNC in August.

Walker is arguing he is a victim too. He bought the house in good faith, fixed it up and has rented it to a tenant, said his attorney, Robert Habib.

"Ricky is legitimate, and that's one reason why the judge entered the order putting him back on the title. Ricky only met Rhonda Evans once, at the closing," Habib said.

Next week, Flynn will set a schedule to hear arguments about who really owns 9220 S. Union.

Rosenson is confident Fredericks will eventually win because the original transfer was fraudulent.

"The system works. Within a year, we achieved a fair amount. It will take another few months to clean it up completely," Rosenson said. "We didn't beat them, of course, because by the time we found them, they had taken out the loan. Right now there is a cloud on the title. No third party would feel comfortable buying the home right now."

It could take many more months before the public administrator's office gets to the same point with the Johnson home. Already, investigators have located two possible grandsons of Arrellia Johnson, both of them in prison. The search for other heirs continues.

As for Randy Johnson, who would have turned 48 in December, he will benefit in a way. The public administrator will bury him privately in the South Side cemetery close to where his mother is interred.

It's not exactly a happy ending, Cook County officials say, but it is better than the pauper's grave that likely would have awaited him otherwise.

----------




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (29904)2/25/2008 7:11:16 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217884
 
good news, finally, gold is about to be transferred from weak and trembling hands of imf and g7 into hands that will inherit the future, as gold had always been destined to be, since before the biblical times

marketwatch.com

i am beyond myself with excitement, for the opportunity to load up and double down, and prepare more properly for the big monetary reset day - the day of reckoning

in the mean time, an article by one who i used to think of as an idiot during the days of ac flyer, but, look, he is making sense

QUOTE

ECONOMIC BEAT



Greenspan Was Right: The Case for Gold, Part I
By GENE EPSTEIN

"UNDER THE GOLD STANDARD," observed Alan Greenspan in a 1966 essay, "a free banking system stands as the protector of an economy's stability and balanced growth."

As you probably heard, a serious bout of instability caused by major imbalances currently plagues the U.S. economy. So a free banking system under the gold standard must be just what the economy needs, if Greenspan had it right.

In that same essay, the future Fed chairman saw another key advantage to a gold standard. While taxing and borrowing against future taxes were the conventional ways government raised revenue, the abandonment of gold permitted a third way: "chronic deficit spending" effectively financed by the "unlimited expansion of credit." A gold standard would end that abuse.

But adoption of gold is not exactly high on the world's agenda. Accordingly, this first installment in my two-part case for gold began with Alan Greenspan's oft-cited essay (called "Gold and Economic Freedom") for a strategic reason. Atlantic.com blogger Megan McCardle was wrong to call the gold standard a "terrible idea." But she was obviously right to point out that "so few economists [are] willing to raise their voices in support of" any version of a gold standard.

It might therefore help to remind readers that the most respected Federal Reserve chairman ever raised his voice in just this way as a seasoned economist of 40, in an essay that was brief but mainly focused on the right arguments. Also, Alan Greenspan's 2007 memoir, The Age of Turbulence, adds to the case for gold, while incidentally helping to suggest why "so few economists" are gold advocates.

The long-standing alternative to gold is, after all, the central banking system, in whose service more than a few economists have found tangible career benefits. That may help explain why The Age of Turbulence never mentions the main point that Greenspan himself made in "Gold and Economic Freedom": that gold would protect the economy from the instability of business cycles. In fact, nowhere does he mention the essay itself. We can only conjecture about the omission in a book that is supposed to chronicle his intellectual development, and which otherwise mentions gold.

I conjecture that he found the argument an affront to his career as a central banker. Indeed, the same essay he buries down the memory hole aggressively indicts the Federal Reserve for playing a destabilizing role. We can regard the 1966 essay as representing his most recent thought to date on this point, since nothing else is available.

The Age of Turbulence does make an additional point in favor of gold not mentioned in that original essay: that a gold standard would prevent price inflation. In the most disturbing, and valuable, section of this book, Greenspan sees an end to the era of tame price increases, beginning around 2030. He points out, first, that the benign "disinflationary pressures" from economies like that of China will have played out by then. And at the same time, inflationary pressures could be intensified by the fiscal "tsunami" brought on by retiring baby boomers.

He affirms that gold would check price inflation, referring to the "gold standard's inherent price stability." So why not support gold for this important reason? It turns out that, while the Greenspan of 1966 objected to chronic deficits financed by "an unlimited expansion of credit," the Greenspan of 2007 now accepts that very thing. "I have long since acquiesced in the fact that the gold standard does not readily accommodate the widely accepted ...view of the appropriate functions of government," he candidly admits -- namely, the "propensity of Congress to create benefits for constituents without specifying the means by which they are to be funded."

But to accept the government's power "to create benefits...without specifying the means by which they are to be funded" is effectively to endorse the government's right to finance its operations, not just through taxing and borrowing, but through the unilateral creation of money and credit. On this point, gold advocate George Reisman observes: "When the government need not obtain its funds from the people, but instead can supply the people with funds, it can no longer easily be viewed as deriving its powers and rights from the people."

So let us repeat Alan Greenspan's three main arguments for gold. A gold standard will protect the economy from 1) the business cycles that have long burdened it and 2) the rapid price inflation that Greenspan sees as a future plague. It also will 3) prevent the government from raising funds through the unilateral expansion of money and credit that Greenspan used to regard as a plague on our freedom.

What more overwhelming case can possibly be imagined? For part 2 on this subject, read next week's column.

Restoring Balance: The Case for Gold, Part II
By GENE EPSTEIN

IMAGINE THIS. THE U.S. AND OTHER MAJOR INDUSTRIALIZED nations agree to convert the world's money to a universal gold standard, administered by a system of private banking. Once holders of dollars, yen, euros, pounds and pesos are apportioned the equivalent value in gold, governments retreat to the passive role of legally requiring that all such paper claims on gold receive 100% backing.

Some might ask whether any government would willingly relinquish the power to print money; others might wonder if the logistics of such a radical conversion are manageable. Good questions, both, to which I believe good answers can be given. But in this second of two installments on the case for gold, I argue only that, if such a privatized, 100%-reserve gold standard could be achieved, it would satisfy Alan Greenspan's three main arguments for gold -- the focus of last week's first installment ("Greenspan Was Right: The Case for Gold, Part 1").

Start with Greenspan's first point: "Under a gold standard, a free banking system stands as the protector of an economy's stability and balanced growth." Under the present regime, the banking system's habit of creating money out of thin air has again brought on a feckless expansion of credit, in the present instance creating a huge imbalance in the housing sector and destabilizing the rest of the economy. But where money is gold, and where gold is legally protected by 100% reserve requirements, the great credit-expansion machine will no longer operate. Weekly credit-card solicitations will no longer flood our mail boxes. Fast-buck artists will no longer sell people homes they can't afford. Saving and investing will be carried on through savings accounts, bank CDs, corporate bonds, stocks, reinvested earnings. But because such investment involves scarce funds, it will be allocated according to prudent standards of risk and reward. Irrationally exuberant folks always will be with us, but their chances of starting an Internet bubble will be radically curbed.

One of the abiding monetary myths is that the gold standard got a fair trial in the 19th century, only to be replaced by the Fed's stabilizing hand by the early 20th century. In fact, credit expansion was the norm in the 19th century, almost as much as today. But with a privatized monetary system that holds government at arm's length, and with a 100%-reserve requirement, the chances of credit-cycle abuses would greatly diminish.

Since inflation is a monetary phenomenon, even skeptics probably would agree that a gold standard would satisfy the second of Greenspan's main arguments: A gold standard would curb price inflation. Indeed, Atlantic.com blogger Megan McCardle raised the fear that a gold standard would bring "deflation," which "does rather devastating things to anyone who has debt, since they now have to repay what they borrowed in more expensive dollars."

But by "deflation," she can only mean the contraction of money -- a risk under the current regime, or even under a gold standard with fractional reserves, where the money supply could indeed rise and fall. However, subject to the proviso that the transition to a gold standard would avoid just such a wrenching deflation, the gold supply probably would increase by 2% to 3% a year, while output would rise by 4% or more. That would still mean rising sales. Business would have no more problem paying its debts than it does now.

That brings us to the third and final argument: A gold standard would prevent government from raising funds through the printing of money. The power of politicians would greatly diminish. That can't be all bad.

UNQUOTE