Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter V who wrote (107619)	3/3/2008 6:37:48 AM
From: Giordano Bruno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

2 + 2 to equal 4 -g- The committee concluded after interviewing bank executives, among others, that complex debt products were at the "heart" of the credit market's woes. Central to these problems was that products such as collateralized debt obligations -- pools of debt repackaged into pieces with differing levels of risk and return -- were so complex, so opaque and so badly explained that no one, let alone investors, truly understood their risks, the report concluded. U.K. Panel Warns of Tighter Banking Regulation By ALISTAIR MACDONALD March 3, 2008; Page A2 LONDON -- An influential British parliamentary committee has told investment banks to demystify the complex financial products they sell or risk increased regulation here in London, a financial center that has prided itself on its light-touch oversight of banks. The warning comes as policy makers world-wide sift through the wreckage of the global credit crunch and ask what more regulators could have done to lessen its impact. On Thursday, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke faced questions from the U.S. Senate Banking Committee about how well the Fed and other American regulators supervised banks. Politicians throughout the world, meanwhile, have called for a more global approach to regulation. The Treasury Select Committee's report on Stability and Transparency, to be released today, said Britain's banking supervisors -- the Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority -- need to do more to convey the risks of potential problems in financial markets. While the committee doesn't have the power to change regulations, its mandate is to scrutinize government policy and to influence changes. The committee concluded after interviewing bank executives, among others, that complex debt products were at the "heart" of the credit market's woes. Central to these problems was that products such as collateralized debt obligations -- pools of debt repackaged into pieces with differing levels of risk and return -- were so complex, so opaque and so badly explained that no one, let alone investors, truly understood their risks, the report concluded. If banks aren't doing a better job of explaining such risks within six months to a year, "then regulation would be the only way to sort it out," said John McFall, the member of Parliament who led the inquiry, in an interview. Mr. McFall said that one bank executive, in his testimony to the committee, said that he wasn't an "expert" in products such as CDOs, a statement Mr. McFall views as emblematic of what went wrong. "If you have an executive of a big bank not understanding what a CDO is, what chance has an ordinary" person, Mr. McFall said. Britain has long argued a nonintrusive approach to financial regulation has been a key to London's success as a financial center. Early last year, through such means as their annual financial-stability reports, the Bank of England and the FSA had outlined the type of risks a credit crunch could pose for financial markets. But the banks didn't heed their warnings, the committee concluded. The parliamentary report recommends that, in future, the Bank of England and the FSA highlight the two or three most important risks in a short letter to financial institutions. The Bank of England and FSA also should seek confirmation from those institutions that their warnings have been properly considered and report to the public on the responses, it said. The panel also faulted credit-rating companies for failing to spot and explain the risks, and investors for poor research. Write to Alistair MacDonald at alistair.macdonald@wsj.com

To: Peter V who wrote (107619)	3/4/2008 7:47:07 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 306849

damn I feel hurt and left out, not being banned from the clown free zone. I'm a well known uber-clown (mostly bullish) too. A lot of good people like XBrit and SearchRE are banned there, mixed in with the trash heap Lazarus Long, MKTBUZZ etc. I'll bet that the banned clown free thread could throw a heck of a party as long as guns were checked at the door.

To: Peter V who wrote (107619)	3/7/2008 12:44:18 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

We don't have one on this board because patron lets anybody post here. Which speaks very well of the man, his character, his courage, and his belief in free speech, one of the vital cornerstones of democracies.