Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Off Topic - Anything Goes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (816)	3/11/2008 5:24:22 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6846

If prostitution were not illegal, she would have been hurt less. If murder were not illegal, thwe wife of a murderer would be hurt less too. If that's a valid argument against a law, welcome to anarchy. Tim was saying that if a man cheats on his wife and hurts her by doing that, then she can be considered a victim even though he has committed no crime. He was talking about general cases, not the specifics of the Spitzer case. This whole discussion has been about the Spitzer case. <So adultery produces a crimeless victim, whereas prostitution is a victimless crime. Yeah? Suppose she catches AIDS? Is it still victimless? The wife in this case is hurt both by the cheating, and by the fact that the cheating happened with a prostitute, which makes it illegal. Your marital state is almost never a consideration in whether you are charged with a crime. He committed at least one regardless of that.

To: Cogito who wrote (816)	3/11/2008 10:31:58 PM
From: Stock Puppy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6846

en.wikipedia.org What Rhode Island and Nevada have in common.