Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (75571)	3/19/2008 11:18:25 AM
From: engineer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197214

Chinese law is a book 1 inch thick. french law is a book 16 feet long. Perhaps a ruling as to how stupid this brief is would come sooner... More to the point. The case is in a UK court between a Finnish and US company. What the heck does French law have to do with this anyway? And this is the amended comp[laint to a US DElaware court case? Even more of What the heck does French law have to do with it? Why is a delaware case being heard in France?

To: JGoren who wrote (75571)	3/19/2008 11:04:05 PM
From: acementhead	Respond to of 197214

American law says the President can steal from cash-holders and hand over the proceeds to whomsoever he chooses. At present Bush is taking about 15% a year from QUALCOMM and handing it to his buddies. Anyone who can't understand this must be as stupid as Bush is. Anyway Q is losing over a billion Bucks a year of value from its cash. Interest disclosure: Sold out of Q nearly two years ago( I created the $34 bottom), after holding continuously since Sept 97, and out of US$ more than 18 months ago. Of course in retrospect I was an idiot to have not got out of US$ immediately, but I'm a hopeless optimist and had hoped to get back into Q.