SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (55994)3/25/2008 10:07:01 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543224
 
I'm fine with lying being a crime about things that matter- but lying about things that aren't crimes, or part of a crime, shouldn't be a crime. I draw my line there.



To: Dale Baker who wrote (55994)3/25/2008 10:14:40 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 543224
 
but we have to draw the line somewhere

Maybe we should draw the line in the questions asked, not the answers given.

I've actually experienced a scenario where people were asked under oath about their sex lives questions that were irrelevant to the investigation. I did a lot of soul searching at the time and discussing with my colleagues and concluded that lying is acceptable under those circumstances. I can't draw a hard line on the answer when the question is off base.