Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (56401)	3/27/2008 12:28:12 PM
From: Katelew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 545024

My general impression has been that she has for some time been arguing that the two states should hold a re-vote or let things stand. Sometimes her statements on the issue have been truncated to make it appear she's trying to lay claim to the original MI vote period.

To: JohnM who wrote (56401)	3/27/2008 12:30:07 PM
From: NAG1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 545024

John, <<My concern about Clinton's approach is that she is acting as if she didn't agree to the same conditions everyone else did, then left her name on the ballot when everyone else took theirs off. So Obama's name was simply not on the Michigan ballot.>> I don't disagree with you. But even with this in mind, something does need to be done about Michigan and Florida otherwise it looks like the democrats are disenfranchising voters. Do you really want that hanging over the head of the eventual nominee(who I think will be Obama regardless of what gets decided on with Florida and Michigan) when November comes around. Neal