SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : $2 or higher gas - Can ethanol make a comeback? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gg cox who wrote (2669)3/29/2008 11:56:08 AM
From: gg cox  Respond to of 2801
 
<<<“It’s the sun, stupid"...>>>

<< Cut down every plant on Earth and make it into a fuel. You get 7 terawatts, but you need 30. And you don’t eat.>>>

<<Then he turned to the sun, his research focus, which bathes the planet in 800 terawatts of energy continually. “We only need 18 of those terawatts,” he said. But the current level of investment in pursuing that energy, he said, isn’t even close to sufficient. >>

dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com



To: gg cox who wrote (2669)3/29/2008 10:07:37 PM
From: richardred  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2801
 
>Pickens opinion on ethanol is as good as any other.

> Take away the subsidies to ethanol and let the street decide it's value as fuel.

I could agree with you more on the second point. The reason why I found that read interesting. His view changed from a staunch opponent. I find the wind energy investment as not a good one currently, but many though it laughable the US would never walk on the moon. I am open to see all alternatives develop is my main point of thought focus. Economics to their ultimate end game. Am I right that I currently see GE is developing wind energy. Their one of many developing that infrastructure. 6 Sigma GE is not for loosing money in the long run are they.

If you didn't already know this was my last posted view on this ethanol thread. I have all my views posted somewhere on this thread. My views can change,because of changing conditions, but I think I have been fairly consistent on my view as a whole.

FWIW- Not sure if I have my progression views in order or have all of them listed.

Message 22626861
Message 20650874
Message 22340592
Message 21368738
Message 20650320