SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (376427)4/5/2008 4:09:26 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1576926
 
"Seems like you would. "

Based on what?



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (376427)4/5/2008 4:14:56 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576926
 
"Personally, I would not tolerate even an attack on the level of 3/11 in Spain or the 2005 London bombings."

What do you think we should do Ten - attack a country that wasn't involved, but, that we don't like?



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (376427)4/6/2008 3:11:04 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576926
 
>Seems like you would. "That's bad, but not as bad as 9/11 and certainly not as bad as what 9/11 could have been."

Well, if a few hundred people died here, I would not think that there's any reason to kill hundreds of thousands of people elsewhere.

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (376427)4/6/2008 6:10:47 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 1576926
 
not as bad as what 9/11 could have been

Your scenarios just aren't scary enough to stampede the public anymore. You need to forget Bin Laden and start worrying people about Lex Luthor and his plan to blow apart he San Andreas fault with nuclear bombs. He's much scarier, less hairier, and a whole lot more plausible.

TP