Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (32813)	4/10/2008 1:48:40 PM
From: Rolla Coasta	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219612

Who, or what chose the father of her children if not a human being? What chose her to have children if not her? Love is what chose the father of her children, not robotic machinery that is programmed to choose what gene is good and not good. And to have a doctor that does the DNA trick is like risking a new-born in human error. I rather do it naturally cuz I don't trust any doctor. So, as you should be able to see, human beings, aka people, and specifically female people, do the genetic selecting already. They have always done the genetic selection. It sounds like there's no love involved in the mating process. Making no love in a supposed-to-be loving making process while mating is like men being raped by women in the genetic selection process. Your saying implies men is women's sex slaves. What I'm proposing is that they be able to do less guesswork, crossing of fingers and hoping they don't get a mutant baby, and instead directly select the DNA they want. My English professor happened to be a conservative Christian. So she had her opinion in all genetic DNA selection cuz it is "not" according to God's way. Check if all conservative Christian groups agree on your proposal. You are saying that it should be illegal for her to choose. Which means you think the state should dictate the genetic selection process. Which is what you are saying is a bad thing = state run eugenics = women forced to have babies using the processes dictated by the state. No, she already has freedom to choose. I suggest you better check what Monsanto is doing if you care about dictation of state. Monsanto is controlled by state and dictate the way we choose.