Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (379021)	4/18/2008 3:50:13 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575048

"The Soviets could have sid the same." Except that trade unions were never outlawed under the Soviets. Besides that, yeah. "Because they believed the Jews controlled international finance." Amongst other things. Still, how is that socialist? "They produced a few and had built a factory to build more. The war delayed things." The real point behind the factory was to build war material. "No, but I don't think nationalization of all industry is necessary for socialism. " Which didn't happen in Nazi Germany.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (379021)	4/18/2008 3:50:44 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575048

"The Soviets could have sid the same." Except that trade unions were never outlawed under the Soviets. Besides that, yeah. "Because they believed the Jews controlled international finance." Amongst other things. Still, how is that socialist? "They produced a few and had built a factory to build more. The war delayed things." The real point behind the factory was to build war material. "No, but I don't think nationalization of all industry is necessary for socialism. " Which didn't happen in Nazi Germany. Not even close. So what is your point here?