Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (379065)	4/18/2008 4:22:56 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575466

"The Soviets could have sid the same." Except that trade unions were never outlawed under the Soviets. Where is Topcat when you need his spellcheck.......

To: combjelly who wrote (379065)	4/18/2008 5:36:07 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575466

<i..trade unions were never outlawed under the Soviets. You mean the Soviet union had free trade unions? "Because they believed the Jews controlled international finance." Amongst other things. Still, how is that socialist? You don't consider the destruction of international finance socialist? "They produced a few and had built a factory to build more. The war delayed things." The real point behind the factory was to build war material. It built war material because they were at war. But the factory was for making Volkswagens and produced some. "No, but I don't think nationalization of all industry is necessary for socialism. " Which didn't happen in Nazi Germany. Not even close. So what is your point here? I think we're forgetting that I mentioned the nationalization of Thyssen as an example of Nazi control.