SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (246483)4/19/2008 6:07:31 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793782
 
You Social Workers are a real bunch of busybodies, aren't you? :>)

I find it hard to believe that anyone on this thread, which is very pro-family, conservative values Republican would agree that letting young children remain in a situation like this is an acceptable alternative. But maybe I;m wrong.

As I said before, I am fine with consenting adults living anyway they please, but when children are forced into sexual behaviors and deprived of any choice in their lives, you're right, I AM a busybody.



To: LindyBill who wrote (246483)4/19/2008 6:10:25 PM
From: Rambi  Respond to of 793782
 
Sorry to repeat the Dallas story- Suma usually posts to me on CEnter, and I didn't realize she had posted to me here.



To: LindyBill who wrote (246483)4/19/2008 6:11:01 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793782
 
A zero tolerance policy inevitably violates people's civil rights far more often than is desirable, but the government is mandated to investigate reported cases of abuse. I do agree suspending parental child custody is a serious matter and when necessary extended family should be considered as the first alternative.

* * *


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News