Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (61117)	4/23/2008 3:01:50 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 542059

Kate, I grow less willing to cut her slack with each passing day. I've even found myself rethinking much of the 90s, including some of the stuff during the impeachment crisis. I have to work to see her doing anything other than doing whatever she can to get the nomination right now and then trying to clean it up afterwards. If I had to debate that position on Iran as a serious foreign policy proposal, thrown out all by itself, the way she did, I, quite frankly, couldn't find any reason to argue for it.

To: Katelew who wrote (61117)	4/23/2008 3:46:26 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542059

<<<Just like M. Albright, Hillary knows the history of Iran and our meddling role in things and that the US should make some reasonable overtures and mend some >>> Somehow women can not project strength. It is unacceptable. When UN ambassador Madeleine Albright asked Colin Powell, "What's the point of having this superb military you're always talking about if we can't use it?" For General Colin Powell, this most military of politicians who has watched men die, the answer was, and remains, simple. "American GIs are not toy soldiers to be moved around on some global game board." Colin Powell projected strength and wisdom when questioned by Albright, but when he was confronted by Bush and Cheney, he folded like a cheap suit.