SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (262863)4/29/2008 2:04:54 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
People's judgement can get biased, even clouded, by financial interests.

It can also get biased or clouded by ideology, political affiliation, emotional state, what their friend tells them, etc. There is nothing particularly special about financial interest.

If someone was to sit in judgment over the issue, and be the person who decides the issue, you would obviously want to exclude people with a financial interest (at least any significant interest) with one side or the other.

But we aren't talking about selecting the decision makers, but rather presenting arguments. The logic of an argument stands by itself. If a stupid, foolish, biased person, with a large financial interest in one side of the case, makes a valid argument, its still valid. If a smart, wise, impartial person makes an invalid argument, its still invalid.



To: geode00 who wrote (262863)4/29/2008 2:05:47 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow U.S. Dominance

foreignaffairs.org