Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (121632)	4/27/2008 8:46:21 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 173976

Looks like Wright thinks he is very entertaining. All I saw was him expecting to lower the standards. He may as well have said he wanted ebonics back. It is funny that blacks in the UK and the rest of Europe have no problem speaking the language.

To: PROLIFE who wrote (121632)	4/27/2008 9:24:55 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Gas is something that nearly everyone in the US uses (besides a few tree huggers living deep in the woods). I would assert that out-of-line profits of oil companies act as a tax on the lower classes to the benefit of the upper classes. Why? Because, especially with $4 gas, lower income classes use a higher percentage of income on gas than upper income. Additionally, many lower class (and today, even middle class) do not benefit from the dividends paid by Big Oil - simply because they don't have as much disposable income to invest as upper income class people. Additionally, oil companies won't even reinvest enough to properly maintain their refineries. There has been an increase in the rate of accidents at refineries, and studies have shown an alarming lack of investment in safety equipment and upkeep. So, redistribution of some of the profits from upper income folk into reinvestment in both new technology and existing infrastructure seems to make perfect sense.