SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (381868)5/1/2008 10:30:39 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572373
 
If you had proof beyond doubt that Saddam had large stockpiles of chemical and bio weapons and a robust nuclear effort underway, would your view have changed?

For an invasion? No.

PS if i knew for sure there were no wmds i would have been 100% opposed to the war.

I figured he might have some chemical weapons. But little or no way to deliver them, and facing sure annihilation if he did.



To: michael97123 who wrote (381868)5/2/2008 6:07:11 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572373
 
PS if i knew for sure there were no wmds i would have been 100% opposed to the war.

Blix asked Bush to wait until they finished their inspections......Bush wouldn't. Why?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News